I love when people try to be kind and quote me using my entirely nonsensical burner name.

They tried it once, it went badly, they apologized and don’t do it anymore. It’s worth noting that they have published articles about why making a prediction was a bad idea and not in keeping with what their page is about.

Right, which he’s apologized for and said he has no business being a pundit and because he acknowledges that he’s not good at making predictions. That’s the point.

It really does hearken back to the Bertuzzi incident because had Steve Moore just fought after cheap shotting Naslund the rest would never have happened. Instead he hid from the tough guys, just like Dorsett did last night, and then it festered until next game. I doubt anything else will ever come of this one, but…

Of course in a Bloomberg article about Trump’s data operation, Trump’s pollsters said their data matches up pretty closely with what 538 has.

You’ve missed the entire point of what 538 does.

You’re looking for some ESPN embrace the debate prediction bullshit that isn’t possible or useful.

In his own words, they don’t make predictions. They just analyze trendlines to tell you what the polls are saying. He has said repeatedly he’s not in the business of making predictions.

I have a lot of friends that went to Penn around the same time. This facebook comment isn’t the first time I’ve heard exactly the same things about lil Trump.

Who are you kidding, he likely could have had off-duty cops volunteer right on Stormfront.

It’s so sad that it’s almost funny. I love weed, I love liquor, and I voted for Hillary yesterday and got drunk and stoned last night.

Okay. But one unlikely thing happening doesn’t mean another will. I’m not sure you’re understanding how probabilities work.

Keep telling yourself that. Funny you can’t point to anything more specific than innuendo about emails that have all now been reviewed. Were you as mad that the Bush administration deleted 22,000,000 emails that they weren’t supposed to, largely Cheney and almost entirely around the dates where we decided to invade…

It spoke volumes to people like me and you (and pretty much everyone else here) but it didn’t say much to the average Fox viewer (e.g. my grandma, who still thinks that it’s a smear campaign against Ailes and probably will never read this book).

But who makes the regulations that say you have to let us know that your products are crappy? That’s still a regulation that you’d say isn’t allowed under your own reasoning. You’re just swapping in less effective regulations that would run afoul of the same (imaginary) constitutional issues.

Right because one of the most highly regarded justices is less reliable than the lobbyists at Heritage that are paid to get to a conclusion before they start their analysis. Of course the Constitution also dictates that SCOTUS interprets the Constitution, so Marshall’s “erroneous interpretation” (in the Kochs’…

yes it is. it’s very much different than that, you can tell because they won in federal court but lost against a jury that was apparently too stupid to understand basic sarcasm. Then a judge took borderline vindictive procedural steps to make sure they couldn’t appeal. They would easily win the appeal under current…

He only won in court because the court made sure to bankrupt Gawker before it could appeal (by not waiving the bond, which is not at all the purpose of such a bond).

Federal courts disagreed, but whatevs.

I dunno, you kind of need to talk to people on their terms if you actually want them to understand you. The officer sounds like he was trying to defuse the situation and gently explain to this asshat that he’s probably not getting his flag back and no one feels sorry for him.