Not particularly; I guess I was more referring to comments and general discussion on other sites.  I've really only read two or three of Scott's reviews, so I can't quite remember what I thought of them.  But nitpicky probably wasn't even the word I was actually going for, there.

Ditto.

Ditto.

@avclub-3ceebd97be4d15313b9ffff365b2bec3:disqus I don't think anything he said was meant to pertain to the entire series.  He said the first season was uneventful and he detected no signs that things would pick up.  It's an opinion that differs from yours; you don't have to make him out to be an asshole because of it.

@avclub-3ceebd97be4d15313b9ffff365b2bec3:disqus I don't think anything he said was meant to pertain to the entire series.  He said the first season was uneventful and he detected no signs that things would pick up.  It's an opinion that differs from yours; you don't have to make him out to be an asshole because of it.

Maybe, but I don't expect much in the way of social grace from Jim anyway (and I think Nanashi has it right).

Maybe, but I don't expect much in the way of social grace from Jim anyway (and I think Nanashi has it right).

I liked the scene where Jim told Charlie about Solomon's suicide; that was very well-played.

I liked the scene where Jim told Charlie about Solomon's suicide; that was very well-played.

Cookies on dowels.

Cookies on dowels.

"It has to explain where Babylon 4 went in time."

"It has to explain where Babylon 4 went in time."

The chart room was straight-up brilliant.  Highlight of the episode for me.

The chart room was straight-up brilliant.  Highlight of the episode for me.

Zapp probably had him on bed-making detail at the time.

Zapp probably had him on bed-making detail at the time.

That's not revelant!

That's not revelant!

'Cause I'm in Chinatown, baby!