Yeah it's a Trek episode in structure but would the kid freaking

Yeah it's a Trek episode in structure but would the kid freaking

I don't see how you're getting that from the show.  Delenn was never, for one moment, during the series, portrayed as anything but basically the pinnacle of sentient life.  Along with Sheridan.  That's why their union is so powerful.  They're basically the two best people ever- to the point where it's even a problem…

I don't see how you're getting that from the show.  Delenn was never, for one moment, during the series, portrayed as anything but basically the pinnacle of sentient life.  Along with Sheridan.  That's why their union is so powerful.  They're basically the two best people ever- to the point where it's even a problem…

I found the same, and for me it's because Garibaldi has some normal problems that I've had, or know people who've had.  Alcoholism, lost love, being lost in situations beyond one's control.  He's a… well, a person.

What horrible speech does G'Kar have?

What horrible speech does G'Kar have?

Kozmo- my problem with the episode is that you even have to ask that question.  It's the basic premise that is so silly to me I can't get past it.  "Give people who believe there's a holy grail"- but there aren't, and there won't be.  Gah.

Kozmo- my problem with the episode is that you even have to ask that question.  It's the basic premise that is so silly to me I can't get past it.  "Give people who believe there's a holy grail"- but there aren't, and there won't be.  Gah.

I love replying to my own posts….
But really I'm replying to Jobo.  Interesting example w/ Buffy because I watched it way after it was off the air.  I like it fine, but I would argue that proportionally it has more weak episodes than B5, but B5 at its best is better than Buffy at its best.

Cool, tx.

Cool, tx.

Believers is not A "objectively."  I just like what it was doing, it's ethical arguments, and the conclusion.  Basically I'm giving it credit for its ambition more than its execution (though its execution is fine).

Believers is not A "objectively."  I just like what it was doing, it's ethical arguments, and the conclusion.  Basically I'm giving it credit for its ambition more than its execution (though its execution is fine).

Great moment.
It's stuff like that which makes me confused when people complain about the acting on this show.  It's like we're watching different things.

Great moment.
It's stuff like that which makes me confused when people complain about the acting on this show.  It's like we're watching different things.

Masthead, how can you call Ivanova "asexual?"

Masthead, how can you call Ivanova "asexual?"

You know why everyone should watch all the episodes?  To get all of our hilarious jokes and cute references.  Seriously, isn't that part of geeking out over this crap?  I giggle every time someone makes a Sub Rosa reference in the Trek threads.  I really really hate anything Ferengi but I'm glad I watched it- it's…

I would probably do the same thing to (though I would also give Midnight an A because I would take the fact that it's essentially a second pilot into consideration and judge it on that basis but that's just my bag).