Yeah, that makes sense to me. Arguments can, of course, be made for others, such as Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, etc… but, of course, to varying degrees.
Yeah, that makes sense to me. Arguments can, of course, be made for others, such as Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, etc… but, of course, to varying degrees.
That is true, I just mean from a purely logical standpoint. When you paint in people's subjective experiences of the situation, it does obfuscate the "objective" viewpoint on the matter for sure.
Is that a real thing that David O. Russel did? I remember he was an asshole that cursed and stuff, but I don't remember allegations like that, but that's totally possible I just didn't read them / don't remember them.
Woman: "I was raped by that man."
Man: "I did not rape that woman."
I don't really care about Kesha's music or anything. I don't have a stake. It's odd, however, to basically say, "Hey, this person isn't that person" in response to reading about how one of them was maybe raped and abused for years, though.
That's a fair response. I have the opposite perspective on this movie, and it sounds like, The Prestige. That's cool with me, though - just different tastes.
Meh, the "it wasn't a surprise, I knew it all along" argument is a bit tired, to be honest. I expect, at least, that most people would describe it as a "twist." My point isn't that it was super surprising, but rather that the focus on that reveal deflated the other, grander themes I thought it might explore in more…
That story is almost as good as the story in "Gone Girl."
Yes, please.
Yes.
I have the minority opinion that the twist in Gone Girl deflated my interest in a big way. There were parts I really liked, but I was looking for something else, I guess. They touched on media fascination with murder, and infidelity, and the court of public opinion… but the twist sort of deflated most of those…
I don't want FOP, goddammit! I'm a Dapper Dan man!
I'm pretty sure the argument I laid against you was in regards to your "joke", rather than attacking you personally. But it's cool if you are, in fact, a simpleton that has to resort to ad hominem attacks and can't take a single iota of criticism of your post, even though I think I leveled it pretty fairly without…
Jerk!
But I'll also add that, to your credit, your post wasn't that bad in terms of internet misogyny (compared to, uh, the norm), so maybe my point comes off too harshly.
For some reason, the fact you posted "I'll start the misogynistic posts" bothers me more than the typical objectification/demeaning of women on the internet. Maybe it's because a phrase like that just begs for someone to tell you that, for once, no one has to "start" the misogyny, and if no one took the initiative to…
I see the problem too. The font looks… hard to read. I'm also using Firefox. But I downloaded Chrome and checked it, and it looks the same. I'm surprised others don't see the issue.
I'm in the same boat, I think. I'm often too slow. :(
I'm not sure. When they had lunch, it felt a bit like his gaze was… odd? I kept sort of expecting he'd be a little too personal with Kim.
Expert execution.