avclub-fc83ad3d76e063f48fb8a0c5a10a4e01--disqus
rainbowsheeps
avclub-fc83ad3d76e063f48fb8a0c5a10a4e01--disqus

I honestly disagree with this - I really don't feel like her acting has been stellar. I found her to be uninteresting in Gone Girl, and I find her even more uninteresting here. She's got a gruff tone. She can say lines. But I don't think she actually makes me believe she's a real person instead of an actress,

I'm honestly not sure, though, that the audience of the show would accept that. I don't know that the average TWD viewer would suffice for character arcs and fighting for sustainability, etc. I agree that it could be done better, but I also think a show about zombies and people against people would necessitate that

I'd die.

Do you think, then, they would let me approach the smallest member of their settlement, and eat them?

Hopefully none. Hopefully he gets eaten soon.

Hm, I disagree - I think the last two seasons of the show are miles, miles beyond anything that came before it. Man, the show was a struggle sometimes, and even hard to hate watch at times. But I think it's actually at a place now where there's enough character growth and there's enough interesting tension and such

I think if there was a nuclear apocalypse, the Amish might be the ones that hold out the longest. At least, ones that are far enough removed from the big cities and stuff, geographically. They have self-sustaining settlements, live without power, etc… they already often have negative views of big-city people, and

From the stray observations:
"Fear The Walking Dead will be back in 2016 with 15 more episodes, and The Walking Dead will return next week. If AMC keeps this up, there will be almost no zombie-free TV weeks in the future."
Isn't the show proper returning 10/11 - not 10/3 - and the finale airing next week? So, this is a

Is it a comedy? Relation type stuff?

Breaking Bad is "decent", yes, haha. I do recommend it. I believe Ritter is in… season 2? Or is it 3? Whatever season it is.

What's so 'evil' about TP?

Well, I thought it was pretty good. I'm definitely excited, given how well-crafted Daredevil was for the most part. I'm not even remotely as familiar with the character or premise here, but I loved Ritter's performance in Breaking Bad, so I feel like I'll like this alright. I hope, at least.

Agreed. When I think of Olivia Wilde, that's actually what I envision - I guess in part because it's the best movie she's been in, I love it, etc. etc. She is definitely one of the most attractive women on the face of the planet though and a pretty good actress sometimes despite that fact.

I may have rose colored glasses on for that part to try to justify at least part of the money I spent on seeing it in 3D.

Interesting. Is that really a thing? I thought that the "and" was often for a supporting big name actor - regardless or not of whether they die or whatever. I figured, at the very least, he'd be alive and maybe just tell the kid to do stuff sometimes, but still be a factor.

Indeed. The worst to me was not even just the sense of being lied to in the film's promotional material and losing the film's most interesting actor so soon - it was the sudden realization that Beefcake McSourpuss was going to be the sole lead for the rest of the film, with brief flashes of Fat Godzilla.

Or, you know, no one watches it after week one.

Isn't that the worst? Like that newer Godzilla movie that had Bryan Cranston in all of its advertising, and he was in maybe 15 minutes before the movie was turned over to that tree branch for some reason.

Is it just the two, then? Did you wish death upon the others?

I think that's pretty drastic. Hopefully the man - a human being - dies before he creates a movie you don't want to see, despite the fact you could simply choose not to see it?