I really appreciate the dynamic between Sherlock and Gregson, especially in contrast to Sherlock's with Watson. With Watson, it's a relationship that was forced together between two people who had to learn to respect each other, and with Gregson it was almost just kind of accepted, particularly by Sherlock who took…

Wanderlust suffers from some of the worst characterizations I've ever seen though. At one point in the film Aniston and Rudd's characters completely switch personalities and motivations without any real build up or explanation, I just couldn't help but give up on the film after that.

No one I know thought it would be Moriarty, it's too soon and there wasn't enough build up, nevermind that Vinnie Jones doesn't really look the type - though that would have been a good twist and against the type Moriarty usually gets portrayed as.

I have to say it was really interesting to see this Sherlock go down the path to being a murderer/criminal (or at least go to the extremes he went to tonight). The BBC Sherlock mentions up and down how that Sherlock is toeing the line and is always one step from crossing it, and yet despite how different the…

I think these kinds of things are meant to be that way though, for instance I've been wavering on watching both Vanilla Sky and Eyes Wide Shut for some time because absolutely everyone I've talked to has either hated them or loved them, with no in betweens. And I mean those movies are not open and shut cases, they're…

I think these kinds of things are meant to be that way though, for instance I've been wavering on watching both Vanilla Sky and Eyes Wide Shut for some time because absolutely everyone I've talked to has either hated them or loved them, with no in betweens. And I mean those movies are not open and shut cases, they're…

@kevinivek You realize saying 'you just don't get it' is literally the bare minimum for an argument? Maybe I got it just fine (honestly what was there to get?) and I just didn't like it.

@kevinivek You realize saying 'you just don't get it' is literally the bare minimum for an argument? Maybe I got it just fine (honestly what was there to get?) and I just didn't like it.

Dude, you don't need to defend every single thing he does. People are going to not like his stuff, sorry.

Dude, you don't need to defend every single thing he does. People are going to not like his stuff, sorry.

I've said it like three times dude. They're all handsome and smart and witty and yada yada. And the POV doesn't excuse the level of cheese and pretension. Some, sure, especially if it was coming from a couple of the characters but like I said, they all sound like exactly the same character and they're all so well read…

I've said it like three times dude. They're all handsome and smart and witty and yada yada. And the POV doesn't excuse the level of cheese and pretension. Some, sure, especially if it was coming from a couple of the characters but like I said, they all sound like exactly the same character and they're all so well read…

I really need to say that the staff's embracing of this show's off kilter, off the wall world is so refreshing. They could easily pick apart its insanity or heavy handedness and every week we could get the same old review of how ridiculous it is, but I like that they are reviewing the show from the other side of…

I thought it was hilarious that I was certain for a while that the father would be the one normal, plain human being in the whole book but then halfway through, oh no wait, he's got some precious platitudes to spew and is totally at peace with life and the universe and is just as special as everyone else, haha.

I thought it was hilarious that I was certain for a while that the father would be the one normal, plain human being in the whole book but then halfway through, oh no wait, he's got some precious platitudes to spew and is totally at peace with life and the universe and is just as special as everyone else, haha.

Door County, WI isn't a city though, it's a, ya know…county.

I mean in terms of plot holes and hugely unnecessary bits that take up whole parts of the film. I'll give you "tight" as in, it was cool looking and interesting and was decently exciting, but in terms of writing and story it was the messiest heap of stuff the director just really wanted in his movie.

I mean in terms of plot holes and hugely unnecessary bits that take up whole parts of the film. I'll give you "tight" as in, it was cool looking and interesting and was decently exciting, but in terms of writing and story it was the messiest heap of stuff the director just really wanted in his movie.

The greatest flaw any of the characters in the book have are that they have cancer - which is ironic because there's at one point in the book where Hazel remarks that that's how people see them. But it's true. All the characters are equally witty, and smart, and sassy, and extremely well read and versed in all the…

The greatest flaw any of the characters in the book have are that they have cancer - which is ironic because there's at one point in the book where Hazel remarks that that's how people see them. But it's true. All the characters are equally witty, and smart, and sassy, and extremely well read and versed in all the…