"More like David Fuckass Walrus."

It's no World's Greatest Dad, but I'd recommend it. I think reviews were mixed largely because some people were uncomfortable with how much pleasure it seemed to take in depicting acts of violence against douchebags. But based on your top level comment here I feel like this won't be an issue for you.

I was somehow aware of this incident before she got litigious about it. I think I need to reconsider how I spend my free time.

I think you're probably right, but just to play devil's advocate: if all her friends and family have already seen it (or at least heard about it), then she could be genuinely mortified but not really care whether the number of strangers involved is 10 million or 100. If you feel the damage is already done, you might…

Oh, I uh, conquer.

I've always loved GNU.org's hyperbolic but largely accurate take on this:

I torrented this comment even though I could've read it for free like 14 different times in this thread.

Also, Hulu is terrible.

I remember reading that Netflix used piracy data to decide which shows to by the rights to in certain international markets. May have just been a rumor though.

My favorite fan theory is that Stanley and Stanford Pines are two different people, and that the one who isn't Grunkle Stan was body-swapped into the goat we occasionally see hanging around. Perhaps the author "hasn't been himself" because he has been a goat.

It is unnatural, but that's only a problem if you think that the deviations from 'normal' circumstances are going to affect consumption while watching TV in special ways. That's certainly a potential flaw of the study since there's no proof that that's not the case, but I see no reason (and I don't think you've even…

The study examined the effect of watching (good) TV on caloric intake as compared to the effect of other activities. The availability of the snacks was a constant in the scenarios being compared. It's a valid comparison. I think the problem here is that you're reading claims into the study that it really isn't making.

What difference does it make that the snacks were free? They weren't comparing "free snacks" vs "not free snacks", they were comparing several different scenarios in which the snacks were free.

I'm more offended that he's one of those people who knows the background of Ashton Kutcher's character on Two and a Half Men.

I thought 'T' was just for 'transgender'?

Fair enough.

Oh, I see. Is it common to group those together? I would think identifying as agendered wouldn't have much to do with the other two.

I for one am always prepared to deny that my time would be better spent watching CNN. It doesn't really matter what I'm doing at the time.

Ashton Kutcher's full name is CHRISTOPHER ASHTON KUTCHER. This is an anagram for AIR ROCKET SHOT, SPHUHCHERNT. Need I say more?

ace?