avclub-ec581d0fa82907dc6f58d1e70bf346b0--disqus
Chicanery
avclub-ec581d0fa82907dc6f58d1e70bf346b0--disqus

@avclub-b20754d0f1e8ae843e00a8b39a667112:disqus I hated Cell. Everything about it was bad. The way characters suddenly blurt out who they are and their sexuality (flashbacks to The Day Today's The Bureau), the goofy superpowers, the poorly written nature of the thing, misery for misery's sake, the outright stupid

For the last time, Dr. King was a civil rights leader, not a urologist.

That was Sophie Aldred, @avclub-32b63dd70d870580128d83e930199e1c:disqus.

Unfortunately, they've introduced Fred Willard as Fred Willard in universe. So that'd mean they'd need him to play himself, or his identical second cousin.

Go away!

Well, them being the actual X-Men was a longshot.

*turns away, walks away*

Eddie's dead, Niles.

Call K.C. Green.

Damnit, I've been trying to cut down on tears.

And a BA in the-a-tre.

People masturbated to Smalltown boy?

Who is your daddy and what does he do?

I read The Tommyknockers. The idea of the parasitic alien race that uses other species to uh… do stuff wasn't bad. The book, however, is almost as awful as Cell.

Oh, he's not a doctor.

Yes, I know, but through the face plate it seems she is bald.

Absolutely visually beautiful episode. Very well directed with great animation, although some bizarre design on Peebles (is she balding?). However, the lack of story, humour or character beats really dragged it down. Not really much to say on it, pretty but pointless.

I am incredibly confused. This article is dreadfully written, with basic errors like unclosed speech marks, and an inability to explain what happened. How did it get published?