I heard the first half of the album on the radio last week. Yes, the radio. My wife was in the car on the way to work and the DJ said something like, "Well we got the new U2 album in and I like it so I'm going to play it for you now."
I heard the first half of the album on the radio last week. Yes, the radio. My wife was in the car on the way to work and the DJ said something like, "Well we got the new U2 album in and I like it so I'm going to play it for you now."
I think that Singing Detective is accessible, just requires a commitment to watch the whole thing. All of the surreal bits and tangled plot-lines converge in the end.
I think that Singing Detective is accessible, just requires a commitment to watch the whole thing. All of the surreal bits and tangled plot-lines converge in the end.
Hmmn. Lotta ground to cover.
The problem with the "depth of field" argument, is that a good portion of movies — I would venture a guess at more than half — don't use deep focus lenses in the first place. The background is out of focus and we usually don't notice so why would having more depth of field be better in its own right?
Hey Andy, being of a certain age I can't tell if you are being ironic or not.
I certainly hope that they don't assume that "everyone who cares about this is already reading it".
If you care more about the quality of the Floyd cover band than the destinations of the cruise there is something messed up.