I'm not sure what future reviews of this show could really say other than "lolrandom".

I'm hopefully not a troll, and I think he posts way too much, to the point where decent sensible things he might have to say are drowned under a wave of meaningless "I didn't know this thing existed" style posts, where he adds nothing and is only posting for the sake of it. I don't care if he's a shut-in or a racecar…

The story of what Quesada did makes me even happier I will never spend another penny on a Marvel comic again.

Dave makes a lot of sense. Fuck the neighbours, may their house prices wither.

I still remember with fondness the Clerks 2 review backlash from Smith, which largely consisted of "you're a stupid internet nerd, I have a hot wife". There is more than a little schadenfreude seeing this film get savaged.

"Well, I'm generally ambivalent toward him"

I got what he was trying to do fine, I just thought it was awful. Still better than any of his TV series, which were fucking pitiful from beginning to end.

I agree that fewer films have been released on DVD, but that's what we've got the internet for. I've got a stack of films on my hard drive that'll never get DVD releases.

Maybe I was a bit unkind with "sucked", I meant to say a bit very good, and too much suckiness. But even so, it's an odd choice for him to keep using a character who's associated in peoples' minds with a film which was a a failure.

HEED! NOW!!

I watched every episode of Deadwood to see if McShane snuck a reference to antiques in there, but I was disappointed. All that dirt and swearing…load of old rubbish.

Stuff that stays off camera and is never referred to by name?

Ah, Chesty Morgan. "Double Agent 73" was her finest work (probably). John Holmes should have changed his name to "Groiny Holmes" and they could have teamed up.

He does seem to be using the character more and more, which is a weird choice. If Funny People had been more popular, then go for it, but it sucked. Aziz's standup as himself is almost always excellent though.

Not funny. Perhaps this wasn't such a good idea.

It just strikes me as another example of something successful being bought by people … I'm sure you're all thrilled by my highly original theory.

Shepperton Studios is actually a fairly famous film studio - http://en.wikipedia.org/wik… - so it's not so much the BBC that he was cocking a snook at. He does an interview from one of their sound stages for a documentary on him I watched recently.

I seem to recall reading about this in "Ball Four", although the timeline would indicate not (that book was written in 1970). I have read a bit about it though, and it's quite an interesting story. 70s Yankee stadium, sideburns and end-of-Vietnam shenanigans? I say hit.

But imagine if Paltrow were in a group of people talking about whatever Chopra-esque bullshit she wanted to talk about, and a Hater went up to them and just went "IT'S EASY TO LIVE LIKE YOU WHEN YOU'VE GOT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, YOU THICK OVER-PRIVILEGED ASSHOLE! IT'S PRETTY FUCKING DIFFICULT FOR EVERYONE ELSE!" That, I…

I really really dislike Gwyneth Paltrow.