I love British food. I love shepherd's pie, fish and chips, bangers and mash, meat pies, full english breakfasts. I could easily eat it everyday and to the point of American-style obesity.

Well, the multiple villains and sidekicks thing is pretty objective, though I suppose how messy that made the movie is arguable. Personally, I wish they had less elements in order to develop the core characters more. For instance, the initial love interest could have been a great Disney villain - like Gaston level…

I thought it was objectively pretty bad. It's really all over the place. I was really excited to see it because I saw it after it became a phenomenon, but I left pretty perplexed. Disposable trolls, underdeveloped characters, forgettable songs, multiple sidekicks, villains, and love interests, attempting to subvert…

The Misfits were always the true stars.

It's been a while since I've seen the movie, but I remember it as being pretty realistic. I was pretty much the out-of-place, former mathlete in my circle of friends from middle school onwards, and all my friends were regularly doing drugs and banging one another while I sat by trying not to look terrified.

I poked around the profile and the sites he visited, and i didn't see anything that called for violence. I can't say I was too thorough in my investigation, so maybe I missed something.

I watched Slow West, which wasn't very good.

Freedom of speech is an ideal beyond just being a constitutional right though. I get aggravated when people talk about how "freedom of speech" doesn't apply to certain situations when they're advocating censorship, even if they're technically correct.

It was more an opportunity to procrastinate on a project than anything else. Bad timing on my part.

I'm not sure I've ever used the word "feminazi" myself. I generally avoid political conversations (and I think the above is a good illustration of why….I've had two people call me stupid because I disagreed with how offensive a single word is and refused to make blanket statements about the the people who use it).

"Nazi" doesn't bother me. If someone called their professor a nazi because they were strict, it wouldn't bother me. If someone said their boss was worse than Hitler, it wouldn't bother me. Hyperbole doesn't upset me.

Absolutely, there can be. Not all feminists have the same goals, methods, beliefs, and motivations.

I'll take someone seriously if they use it in a certain context and I like to think I'm at least of "some" intelligence.

I don't know if I agree that it's sexist because it refers to a subset of a subset of women and is based on their beliefs. And it could arguably apply to a man too, though admittedly I've never heard it used that way, but I've also never met a man who was an extreme feminist either.

And I don't think disagreeing with you makes me dense.

For someone not "offended", you certainly got worked up and extremely unpleasant. I'm not sure why you keep objecting to me using that word since it obviously fits.

And I disagree that it necessarily indicates something awful.

But it's not a racial slur and if someone uses it to describe someone I also think is unreasonable, it's not going to bother me. If someone uses it to undermine feminism, it would.

I guess I see the term as colloquial hyperbole and don't really take issue with it. If someone really was attempting to equate the two, I would.

Ernest Cline has ruined Deloreans for me.