Nope, definitely not the first one. The assumption that criticism is about "alleging to comprehend the author's intent," like the line about "hidden meanings," is little more than pop culture's idea of literary scholarship—while there are many scholars who focus on the author's intent within certain grounds, it's…

Nope, definitely not the first one. The assumption that criticism is about "alleging to comprehend the author's intent," like the line about "hidden meanings," is little more than pop culture's idea of literary scholarship—while there are many scholars who focus on the author's intent within certain grounds, it's…

While I can appreciate that this book appears to be marketed towards a non-academic audience, and so its drive towards philology and linguistic studies might well be misleading, I'm a little bit confused by this review itself. Academic criticism is rarely about uncovering "hidden meanings, political metaphors, and…

While I can appreciate that this book appears to be marketed towards a non-academic audience, and so its drive towards philology and linguistic studies might well be misleading, I'm a little bit confused by this review itself. Academic criticism is rarely about uncovering "hidden meanings, political metaphors, and…

Hey! I don't think that guy wanted to be respectful and solemn at all!

So just to recap: does this have anything to do with, say, Djuna Barnes, or was the title just chosen because it sounded sort of almost creepy?

It's the Learning Channel the same way that Syfy primarily documents the family-friendly adventures of anthropomorphic VD.

No, "No Homo" translates to "In spite of the homoerotic thing I just said/I am about to say, I am not in fact a 'homo'."

Of course, that will include the remakes of the remakes; by 2031, we will see the exact same movie remade endlessly, with variations only in the increasingly youthful actors farmed out for the lead roles. Farmed out being used, of course, in only the most literal sense.