The one on the screen is actually an Argumentum Ad Populum, but the mistake has been made before:

He kind of does, in an angle-y sort of way.

My "Government and Economic Systems" class watched Sicko. This was during the 2008 Democratic primaries, and I had to get a permission slip signed. The teacher who showed it was an avowed Republican.

Britannia and Marianne?

That's my point; him knowing seems to indicate that this plan has been in development since before he was arrested.

But Tom knew about the plot; either they're informing him while he's in prison, or it's been in the works since before he got arrested (that is, when Rowan was still in power).

I was so annoyed that that poster only had six justices on it. They could have put on all nine and replaced Scalia with Kamala Harris.

Depends on whether or not the stadium is hosting the Republican National Convention.

It's a bit pointless to give Jack Sparrow a love interest; we all know he marries Daenerys Targaryen in the series finale of Game of Thrones.

I can't wait to play this. Once I practice enough, I'll be able to participate in the tournaments they have down at the local Lo-Cal Calzone Zone.

I put in that product specifically for humorous effect, but I would say that my statement applies to other products: Consider smaller 3D televisions, smart watches, smart ovens, smart dishwashers (smart everything), etc.

I think Perd introduced Andy's show, didn't he? Only a voice cameo, but better than nothing.

Re: A tech company adding a superfluous display method despite a lack of functionality and prohibitive expense:

Leslie did ask April and Andy if they wanted to work for her; they turned her down, but their main reasons related to the job originally being in Chicago. Now that it's in Pawnee, it seems like they were happy to join (or, as happy as April can be to do something).

A quick google of "do cetaceans sweat" indicates that no, they don't. We'll have to wait for the metaphor to be revised to something more scientifically accurate.

What's the problem with implying that? It seems pretty clear.

http://www.theonion.com/art…

I kept thinking of them as "the one with the thinner head" and "the other guy". It got even worse whenever Napier popped up.

(MILD SPOILERS)

I think the AV Club has discussed this previously: the decision at the time was "beaver-damming".