avclub-da8b6898c97db5ff0de5c5b45bf96a74--disqus
mostlyharmless23
avclub-da8b6898c97db5ff0de5c5b45bf96a74--disqus

Yeah he never said that. Nor did Christie hyndes. That's a defense mechanism for when you're cornered for being a self righteous dick online.

You're a loser and nothing you think matters. Nothing.
Cute little paragraph though.

"Why don't you just leave and not read it if you don't like it" is not a legitimate answer to my question of why anyone gives a shit about this.
That's probably because the answer is that being perpetually offended is something that makes you feel better about yourself, socially progressive, and elevate yourself above

Ok… But it's not feeding a perception of anything. Again, using that logic anything, literally anything, could be considered problematic.
The fact is that there were slave pirates. That's not a particularly controversial stance. Just because your tendency is to try to find things offensive does not mean that everyone

Those are all awesome

Do you have any idea how insane this logic is when applied to literally any number of things that one will be exposed to in their life time. This is almost the same as arguing that exposure to violent video games makes children violent. It…. Doesn't. But when it comes to everyone getting their daily shame some company

No you're right I'll stop participating in society and the reality that we all live in in which this exists.
I don't have a right to think anything, especially some overblown fucking outrage over the implied message of a toy, is stupid so why don't I just stop participating in society.

I'm so fucking sick of reading garbage like this every day. You try to be historically accurate, people bitch that you're racist, you try to whitewash the unpleasantness of history people bitch that you're racist.

at least it seems like you're learning correct tenses.

That comment would be applicable if there was some kind of solid link between commenting on something=caring about something/caring what someone thinks, which as far as I know there is not.

Fufilling work. Not fufilled. And it is neither. Congress is a joke as is much of the political situation in this country

No… It is not. Attractive actors are often not cast in parts where they are scientists or the smart person in that room because idiot audiences need things spelled out for them and thus we're used to the dorky science guy knowing what he's talking about but usually played as a nerd or social misfit. This works and is

Yeah that's how people who aren't teenagers speak on the Hill.

Lol like I, or anyone for that matter, cares what some random shamer on the internet thinks about my job status.
Anyway the point is that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Tough to blame you though, as i'm sure you do very little except bitching at people on the internet for perceived offenses so that you

I actually work for the democratic party. but congrats on creating your own little reality where anyone who disagrees with you about some dumb bullshit that no one cares about makes them a conservative. Must be nice to live in world where zero nuance exists.

I mean they're not racists, they're just some stupid advocacy group looking for attention so they can fund raise on it and raise their profile in the activism community. That is literally the root of the vast majority of this kind of garbage.

Thinking someone is gorgeous is not an example of sexism. That's ridiculous.

Ugh, being around you must be exhausting.

honestly this is probably the best guess that anyone could hazard.

This…..this is a bit right?