I prefer your early work, before you sold out.

I'm doing my best, but it's difficult. Born in '77, I didn't even like music until NWA came into my life in the summer of '89. It was nothing but hip-hop for me for the next five years. I eventually branched out, but the classic hip-hop sound is so much a part of my DNA that it's hard for me to appreciate styles that…

This is the internet, where the cool thing to do is to pretend that totally innocuous things are "nightmare fuel."

He apparently sells the rights for a dollar, which is pretty swell of him.

That particular voice also has no business coming out of that particular face.

I love the ending. The plot is designed to push the character's code to the breaking point. In the book, it bent. In the movie, it broke. Both seem like reasonable responses. The one Altman chose says more about Altman than it does about Chandler, but it's an interesting take on the character.

Thank you.

Yeah, I read that, but it's not clear. The new film series takes place chronologically in the same time period as the original series, so it could go either way. The recasting of classic characters would seem to fit more into the remake universe than the original.

Oh, you're just butthurt about the time the Enterprise escaped your giant green space hand.

Everyone is always really Khan. I'm Khan. You're Khan. Rainn Wilson is Khan.

I'm sure this has been addressed by previous Newswires, but which timeline is this series taking place in?

My only problem with that is that, after three movies, Pegg's character has still not proven himself to be any good at his job. He keeps insisting he's a real grownup field agent and I keep assuming everybody else is just humoring him.

"I Could Never Take The Place Of Your Man" might be the best song of all time. Not only is it a better Springsteen song than most of Springsteen's songs, it's one of the few tracks where Prince comes off as an actual human. He's not a sexual demigod or a funky messiah. He's just a guy who walked into a bar and had a…

Do you want to defend this point at all or is saying "Nuh uh" over and over again sufficient for you?

I am not saying that at all. Another example:

I said the exact opposite of that when I led my comment with "It is perfectly fine for you to be disappointed in any movie (or any work of "art," a term I use very loosely in connection with big franchise filmmaking like this) and to express that disappointment." You have the right to criticize anything for what it…

I have a real problem with this point of view on a basic level. It is perfectly fine for you to be disappointed in any movie (or any work of "art," a term I use very loosely in connection with big franchise filmmaking like this) and to express that disappointment. But even so, you were not entitled to the film you…

We're supposed to read the articles now?

I'm not even touching you. I'm just going to keep tinkering with the space-time continuum two inches from your face, and if you happen to get winked out of existence, well, that's on you.

Anybody who hated the theatrical cut will not be dissuaded by the extended, but that one shot of the flamethrower cleared up so many plot holes. I cannot for the life of me figure out why they cut it out.