avclub-d7f43e1fb2d4977c86163d9b0cb07814--disqus
I Will Probably Forget This Qu
avclub-d7f43e1fb2d4977c86163d9b0cb07814--disqus

Making fun of Trump's hair is not body-shaming. Making fun of him for needing a combover would be maybe, but pointing out that a ridiculously bad combover is ridiculously bad isn't body shaming, because it's something he has control over and can fix.

I think it was because he "got old", right?

They aren't pre-existing Canadian stereotypes (except for general "friendliness", I guess), they are just continuity in how the Canadians have developed. At first, Terence and Philip was supposed to be a crudely animated show. But then they wanted the characters to interact with the kids, so it became "that's how

Until Trump showed up, I assumed they were deliberately conflating him with Harper.

There is an episode which I believe is called "Earth Day", which is about how liberals brainwash people into believing in global warming. Parker & Stone tend to point to that as when they transitioned into more political and topical material.

I haven't pursued much by him, but in live-action stuff, he just kinda rubs me the wrong way. He doesn't make me laugh. And a friend of mine told me bad stories about him from the L.A. comedy scene. But he was always my favorite part of "The Life and Times of Tim", so he's got that over Scheer.

Right, but in a conversation where nobody did that, it is a strange point to bring up.

I don't actually watch the show, it's quite possible that Scheer is less awful on the show than other people, I just don't like him in general.

Paul Scheer is still my least favorite person involved with this show, but admittedly it's a lot closer now.

They're always heavy presences in the first episode.

I believe that they specified that it was written by an A-list writer, so whoever it is (they don't say, yet), it can't be Pete Jones.

It is a pretty stupid point to make that it is "just about the filmmaking" when you are in the middle of the personal interview portion that everybody has just said counts more than the filmmaking. And that's important, because white dudes with power find it easier to get chummy with other white dudes, which

"So if the argument is "we can't have the only black woman in the script be a prostitute," "

LaMarck seems to be based on the idea that offspring were somehow copying their attributes from their parents, but just differing from reality on when the copy is made. Lysenk seems to think that it's basically magic, that if the environment changes, unborn offspring are adjusted accordingly.

It is difficult to imagine how a single generation could provide significant enough improvements to be measurable (especially at the time of the experiment), and I don't see how it would possibly be any different than the control groups, so I am pretty sure that the experiment would be negative.

Not deleting them seems like standing by them.

Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan, and Chris Pine

Stealing money from Jews that you are murdering in order to fund white-only male-only education hardly counts as a "comprehensive social welfare program".

"With time, The Carmichael Show could develop its message into something far meatier than what it’s beginning presented."