God can see them filming and editing and screening it, so he doesn't need to watch it later.

17 years? Holy shit. Like you, I thought at most it could have been 10.

Precisely. And saying he made "one mistake in describing a scene" is awfully charitable. He made mistakes constantly. Hence why we thought the reviews were lazy. Or I did, at least.

"'It's time to stop being angry at Nicholas Sparks."

I thought the same thing during the baptism scene. It looked like he was having trouble breathing because of the cold.

So her name would be Marcella Martell? That's awful.

Good god, it looks like it's been a hundred years since he was Veers. Thanks to everyone for pointing out his past roles.

Yeah, I also don't watch and read these reviews because, I dunno, I enjoy them? I guess what I'm saying is Todd's prison is pretty entertaining, and thus self-perpetuating.

@avclub-1310027e3cc8905b006af624e99937d0:disqus is right. I do both regularly and I feel fantastic.

Four months after your comment and this is more true than ever. It is consistently stupid.

Not that I didn't initially like Rabin's reviews, or even occasionally later on, but there was such obvious disinterest for far too long.

I will not miss them, but I enjoyed the rest of your comment.

Lisa needs braces.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human breast forever.

That perfectly describes my last girlfriend.

Who would you say is attractive in an offensive way?

Because they're dumb and overly protective of something that they are only connected to by accident of birth? I mean, I'm the same way but I recognize it's completely stupid.

Caressed by boredom and (seagulls in the distance).

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.

"Surprise!…no prize."