avclub-ce7da3812ed2a993e2194cd75e94b18b--disqus
MylesMcNutt
avclub-ce7da3812ed2a993e2194cd75e94b18b--disqus

Unstated here, rather—I agree it's in the text if you dig deeper, but the fact it never comes up here creates some weirdness, unnecessarily. Just mention the trust fund.

I didn't get the sense that was their first session, honestly—but I'd guess that it was a March/April situation.

Seems like they consciously chose not to do the theme song.

I'd say that the way it's pitched to Rory is the height of inanity—"People are always standing in lines—what's up with that?" I think there's a way to make the story less inane, but it wasn't in the initial pitch, and Rory never bothered to come up with anything to excite herself about it.

Wait, they didn't really film in London?! BUT THOSE ESTABLISHING SHOTS WERE SO CONVINCING!!!1!

I honestly find this offensive to the dude from the Oyster Bar from Bunheads than anything else? (Insofar as you think he was that boring. Dude was not a thrilling individual, but he was more Logan than Paul.

Gift from Emily? Gift from Rory? Etc.

That and the Karaoke Bar in Stars Hollow are the two things that come to mind.

I realize this is mostly a joke people are telling, but the more I read it the more concerned I become about the state of sex ed.

No way she's on anyone's couches. Everyone she stays with definitely has guest rooms.

"THAT'S WHAT THE FEATURED COMMENT IS FOR." (This is a Mad Men reference. I'm not actually that deeply angry. But seriously, there's a featured comment for this very reason.)

The revival wants to set Rory adrift, but it can't simultaneously strip her of privilege, and it never entirely squares the circle to make that work.

You definitely need to accept an unstated "there is an inheritance and/or trust fund that's fueling all of this."

I don't think Rory was wrong to be a little weirded out by Sandee going from "we want you to work here" to "traditional job interview," honestly, but the idea she couldn't come up with anything is an indictment.

To signify that it is a specific feature/event—mind you, the feature page lists it as "Binge-Watch," so none of us can agree on how to stylize it to achieve the desired effect.

I think it's their way of noting how much Sookie's absence is affecting her—which, I get, but it still seems overly careless.

I learned during my rewatch of the show that if I dwell on it, I will drive myself crazy.

"Lastly, the car metaphors and then the supplementary comments about the metaphors were so bloody annoying"

I love this comment juxtaposed with the one immediately above/below it. (For me, over a decade has passed, they work in similar circles, and it makes sense they'd have become more cordial and that Jason would want to pay his respects.)

I'd say AYITL makes the argument that Luke and Lorelai never got married or had kids because both were scared that having those conversations would unearth their previous problems. They just sort of let their life go on as it was, never talking about those big picture issues because the big picture was where their