avclub-ca6cb47da12090ffd2470daf51f71be1--disqus
Real Irwin
avclub-ca6cb47da12090ffd2470daf51f71be1--disqus

Mr. Zsaz is still torturing small animals.

It happens to a lot of guys. Don't worry.

"Intercity Pressure" takes on a deeper, darker meaning…

Again, I really, really wish that they had chosen to make Gotham Central instead. That would be a great show (maybe not on network TV) and it wouldn't even need that big of a budget.

Hehehehe.

The original came out a few years before I was born, and I got around to seeing it as a teenager. It's easy enough to find.

Well, you know his C+ reviews are far too vicious for anyone under 17 to read without adult supervision.

Okay, so the movie is probably decent, but is there anyone here who is actually excited for it? Does it have anything in it that the original didn't, aside from Samuel L. Jackson and Michael Keaton?

To be fair, the original Star Wars did not get a remake. Unless you count Lucas' digital tinkering

José Padilha is Paul Verhoeven's non-union Brazilian equivalent.

YOU'RE FIRED!

Thank you for adding a new, disturbing subtext to The Wire.

"And WHAT'S THE DEAL with all these kings?? How many kings does Westeros need?"

Isn't that what Duck Dynasty is for?

Ahem. I believe the actual quote is:

That's a fair point. Katniss is a pretty good heroine, although her two suitors are complete black holes of characters.

That would make perfect sense…if that was actually Mark Wahlberg on the show.

No, Samuel L. Jackson's most popular character wears robes and carries a purple-

Daniel Van Kirk was hilarious as Mark Wahlberg on Doug Loves Movies.

I would say that Hunger Games on the same level as Twilight (though it's not that great), but there are hoards of ripoffs from both properties—Mortal Instruments, what the fuck is that?—which are impossible to distinguish.