Was it just me, or was there a lot of nose rubbing going on in that last scene in the club?
Was it just me, or was there a lot of nose rubbing going on in that last scene in the club?
12 yards long, 2 lanes wide, 65 tons of American pride!
I first saw CT when he was brought on the show just to an elimination and just destroyed Johnny. After that I don't think it was possible to not root for him.
I fell into the same trap a few years back, plowing through a bunch of seasons. Watching it that way you also see how the games went from stupid things like "find a key for cage in a big bowl of beans using only your mouth" to shear insanity like "run repeatedly scross the draft made by a jet engine".
I;d imagine the fact that he was a real estate agent would make it all the more confusing for her about this specific bit of business.
That was the only way I took it, picking that particular show as it is pretty much the highest rated show on TV, not commenting on the actual show.
Well, the duck didn't make it out too well, lasting only until they got to the Chinese restaurant.
Señoritis also has the great finish to the story of the Funke Thanksgiving duck, which is maybe my favorite ongoing joke of the season.
"Heck of a birthday this is shaping up to be."
I still prefer SNL's George F. Will's Sports Machine .
Well, don't forget Lady L, which he was ready to sing in front of Lindsay (and the others) and was only saved by Ken. That doesn't seem too self aware.
Put it in the car.
Too busy helping out a disenchanted little girl in a Jell-O Pudding commercial.
Grover as Bill Cartwright
His using a wounded Farrell as leverage and complaining about his trick knee always make me laugh.
"You missed the baby, you missed the blind man…"
The whole runner of the guys in the Itchy consumes being tormented is great, with the capper of
"You're the guys that didn't like our capering. When you get to hell, tell 'em Itchy sent you."
Trust me, Marge, with today's modern cars, you can't get lost, what with all the silicon chips and such…
He's actually completely wrong on that point as the correct interpretation isn't "kill" but 'murder", which refutes his point of trying to contrast portions of the text.
Considering there were no actual Jews supposed to be living in England at the time that Shakespeare lived (they still were expelled in 1290 and not allowed to officially return until 1655) it does not make his depiction of a Jew as money lending and asking for cuts of flesh (this was the time of blood libels when Jews…