avclub-c862b02975932127779faae44decffb4--disqus
Mr Bleaney
avclub-c862b02975932127779faae44decffb4--disqus

I love The Excorcist III. But whether it is better than Exorcist I is a question that leads nowhere. They are both remarkable films but each in it's own right. The first is almost procedural in feel, the second (or should I say third) is a straight up contemplation of experience in the face of evil. In that respect,

I'm always doing that too. Apparently it's called manic depression.

Hey Wangbanks! You're a feisty one.

Was he a loose cannon? Did he play by his own rules?

@JoeB

Smokey and the Bandit.

Wasn't Pazuzu the demon they used in 'Fallen'?

What no Beatles
I was beginning to think all iPods had at least one Beatles track indelibly burned into them.

Oh dear
I haven't seen this movie, nor do I want to (if I did I'd probably take a little wander downtown and voluntarily sign the sex offenders register). Also, I haven't unfortunately got time to read all the previous comments, ensconced as I have been in the NCC domain. However there is one point I wanted to bring

That's another one I caught in the cinema as a child. Christ they were lax back then! And it remains one of my all-time favourites. But the scene I absolutely love, and always comes to me when I think of this film, is at the beginning of the boat-based second half. When they're chasing the shark by releasing sealed

My father took me to see The Exorcist when I was seven years old. He told my mother that he was taking me to see Swiss Family Robinson, or some other Disney thing. He had a habit of doing that. My childhood memories alternate between sepia hued childish idyll and blood-spattered nightmare. And seeing the Exorcist on

He said, sipping a cappucino while idly leafing through Sociology for Wankers.

The first rule of Gay Club is…

Nevertheless, I really couldn't give a toss.

The wonderstuff
I really couldn't give a monkey's about them.

I see what your saying, though I'm not sure I see your point. People have named their children after places, cities for some time. It's a peculiarly American trait though not common enough to be culturally significant.

See comment below.

It really doesn't help my case when I misspell not only monstrosities, but also misspelled.

Mohammed has a long and respected history. Going back to at least as far as 570AD. What I'm talking about is the succession of mangled originals, concatenated monstrosoties, mispelled classics.

And the letter R.