He wasn't a historically great hitter, no; but he was still improving, significantly so, prior to his injury. He pretty clearly had the tools to be a legitimately great hitter, and was maybe a season or two away from putting it all together when he got hurt.
marcus75
avclub-c3be6e8cf75a921162b52b8937e66da9--disqus
My personal TSB season highlight is probably the season I had 4 1000-yard receivers with SF (Rice, Taylor, Brent Jones, and Roger Craig doubling down with 1000 rushing yards; the great disappointment of that season was that FB Tom Rathman ended with something like 996 receiving yards).
Upvoted for my brother, who always played the Bears and inevitably lost the NFC crown due to Anderson being on the bench.
One of my brothers discovered DL Lurching and immediately proceeded to score about 27 sacks with William Perry the next time we went head-to-head in season.
Players had a Player Condition stat that rose and fell over the course of a season and acted as an attribute multiplier. The cycle for each player was preset, so any given player would always have their hot or cold streaks at the same point every season. Even a "Cold" Bo would still have been a top-10 RB, and "Hot"…
Tecmo Bowl - NES (8-bit) limited number of teams, 9 players to a side IIRC, 4 plays.
Tecmo Super Bowl - NES (8-bit), full NFL teams, 11 players to a side plus a limited bench, 8 plays, full seasons.
Super Tecmo Bowl - SNES (16-bit), full teams, larger rosters, yadda yadda.
That had to be a later version. In the Tecmo Super Bowl discussed here (not Super Tecmo Bowl, which was the title for the later SNES sequels), Heyward played for the Saints.
It's not anything near ghastly; to put it bluntly she's taken far, far worse publicity photos.
What hurt her is a perceived lack of genuineness that she does a terrible job of countering. Few, if any of her photo ops help and some actually reinforce the perception.
Probably didn't hurt that it had "America" in it too, which gave it a sort of vague specificity that Clinton's slogans lacked.
That makes me wonder if campaigns would be better off focusing on a single slogan for all their . . . branding (I didn't want to use this word, but really couldn't think of anything else).
I'd wager more people would name "Yes We Can!" as the Obama slogan than "Change We Can Believe In."
"Stronger Together" was in most, if not all, of her campaign ads.
For track or wrestling, no; but football? You're damn right they're taking away birthdays.
Because legality. It's easy baked-in narrative conflict if the teacher can potentially lose their job and go to prison. The second scenario, while arguably more common and maybe even creepier since it indicates a layer of long-term strategy involved, doesn't have the same stakes.
Always like this.
http://cdn.hark.com/images/…
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter was published a year later and got a movie four years sooner. It made 100 million more than PPZ, so . . . corroboration, I guess?
First I can remember hearing/reading the term was in connection with Gamergate.
"who else did the Republicans offer?"
Fiorina and Carson, as Thomas R. has already pointed out. Both of whom are charisma vacuums, even apart from any Trump comparisons, and prone to the kinds of blatant nonsense that even a lot of Trump supporters roll their eyes at (the pyramids were grain silos! Planned Parenthood…
At this point I don't think anyone would buy Holloway as the kind of straight-laced character Rick started out as.