avclub-c2d8e160dd0b0d87ace52cf8289b26d4--disqus
bigstimpycat
avclub-c2d8e160dd0b0d87ace52cf8289b26d4--disqus

but he only said it twice.

is anyone creeped out by ken jeong's absurdly small womanish hands?

i am seriously attracted to matt berry's hair & i'm not ashamed to admit it.

but who is taking care of things at darkplace hospital???????

i believe this was the whole reason for this plot.

something something honky mofo

yes & there were snacks.

stephen king's note to self: monsters that grab people waiting on the edge of their seats.

no, you're not the only one.

the whole first paragraph.

yay for mentioning her!

from what i recalll, the end got very convoluted.

malory is lucille with a gun.

its uses.

that wasn't my point at all.

so why is the ann romano blurb fronted by a photo of schneider?

as a playwright, this type of review drives me nuts. i respect the criticism that this movie didn't do a good job in establishing relationships which seems to be what it is supposed to be about. what i don't like is the main thrust of the review which is "i was expecting x type of movie and it was y type of movie,

and we can turn him off.

bumblebee man?

or maybe not enough pie? (say this in dr. zoidberg's voice for the intended effect)