I'll disagree with all of that. Wrong, wrong, wrong.

We were pretty huge LOST fans when MI4 came out and knew that Holloway was in it. Imagine our incredible disappointment when he died right in the beginning

I forgot that guy existed, just like Hollywood apparently. Yeah, he's cool. My sister and I were so sure he'd be a big movie star after Lost.

"I like them about the same" implies that.

Seriously? I can understand liking Nolan (I'm harsh on him but he's not exactly untalented) but saying he's as talented as Spielberg is a HUGE insult to Spielberg.

Liam Neeson always had the particular set of skills needed to be an action hero.

Blanchett's a fucking badass villain.

At least admit Spielberg makes sci-fi that's a million times better than Nolan.

There's line graphs, triangle graphs, pie charts, pie, there's a little elf who dances a merry jig and explains in song, and it all makes a lot of sense.

I'll explain it in detail someday.

Yeah? I'm Indian and that awful, awful movie was one of the few depiction of Indians at the time.

I agree that Chris Pratt isn't right for the job but I'm angling for my man Timothy Olyphant to get the job.

Listen, GL is the only person willing to do something new with his creations. The prequels are at least original.

That's brilliant. Find a way to kill Short Round and Willie in that mix and it fixes the whole franchise.

He created the character and he understands it. Even when the franchise was in unfamiliar territory with 50s sci-fi there was still distinctly Indy in the center of it.

Ugh. You know, EVERYBODY knows what young Harrison Ford looks like.

We need Steven Spielberg more than ever. Stray Nolans are running around, making average sci-fi and the public treats it like the second coming.

This gig sucks. Go to hell you old bastid!

Don't do it Steven. You got new, original movies to make.

What? How are those two related?