I don't think it makes much sense for Clay to be behind the home invasions. Not after we saw someone who appeared to be the leader looking over Clay's birth certificate, etc. from his safe like they were going to use them for some nefarious scheme.

I don't think it makes much sense for Clay to be behind the home invasions. Not after we saw someone who appeared to be the leader looking over Clay's birth certificate, etc. from his safe like they were going to use them for some nefarious scheme.

Won't somebody please think of the children!

Won't somebody please think of the children!

My eyes may have been low-down dirty deceivering me but I re-watched this episode recently and was the part that Kaylee discards in the trash heap the same thing that caused all the problems in Out of Gas?

My eyes may have been low-down dirty deceivering me but I re-watched this episode recently and was the part that Kaylee discards in the trash heap the same thing that caused all the problems in Out of Gas?

I've seen this method before too - in the old 90s Nikita series. Nasty enough for me to remember for over a decade.

The spy being Skye was telegraphed heavily at the end of the pilot.

I agree with almost everything said in this thorough, well-thought-out article. And it didn't even get into the detail of the self-indulgent 5/6-part finale-athon which I consider its greatest weakness/failing.
 
And yet, I can't help but love it, along with everything else Sorkin has written.
 
In fact, reading this has…

I keep thinking that Father Olmos is Hanks' Harry (in the sense that he's not really there; just a figment of his imagination). He does interact with objects in the sets/locations but he hasn't spoken to anyone other than Hanks yet and Harry does pick things up occasionally too.
 
Has anyone else thought about this or…