avclub-b72d1cea770268863d0d2d29a1bd5ec7--disqus
DanFaraday
avclub-b72d1cea770268863d0d2d29a1bd5ec7--disqus

IMO? Help play up the awkward factor. Like wearing socks with sandals.

Reportedly, some of Eccleston's scenes were cut for more Loki screentime. So, basically, blame tumblr.

It's funny because it's really only three franchises they don't currently have. It just so happens that those three franchises have ALL the villains worth a damn.

If anything, Expose proves that there were just like us, fans all along.

There seems to be this general idea among the fanbase that Darlton was constantly taking fan reactions and criticisms and tweaking the show appropriately. Sure, they were tuned into those things and very active with the fans but the idea that we all influenced the show in some great way is just absurd.

I'll be in my bunk.

Jackasses.

Sadly, someone will take this as a misogynist comment here.

She was completely unnoteworthy in Seeking Justice which I admit I only watched as a fan of over the top Nic Cage performances. Sadly, it was disappointing even in that regard. The only decent thing about that movie was Guy Pearce.

Thank you for answering my question of "Is that Olivia Wilde looking all gorgeous and such there?."

Basically this. It'd be nice if in the future they decide to do an episode like this again they actually have a larger budget and can afford to do a new credits sequence because it'd be a nice touch. Or maybe get Dan Harmon to bankroll it.

Who the hell actually pays attention to what kind of phone people have? They all look the same anyway, just black rectangles.

Except I don't think I've ever heard any Skylar detractors actually come out and say Anna Gunn is a bad actress. January Jones gets that rap mainly because of her other work, especially X-Men: First Class, and people can't disassociate the two.

Vince Gilligan uses the term "jagoff?" I feel so validated.

I have this horrible feeling they're gonna mess all that up because they seem so intent on making her more sympathetic on the show. Also, not being in her head could be a huge detriment to that plotline.

If they stay true she won't be doing much staring at all.

The problem is there isn't a really good solution. I just wish the people who make these sub-threads would just hold off on posting them instead of always doing so as soon as the review goes up. It lacks respect.

Betty, admittedly, was meant to be a half hour episode and it shows. There was just too much going on with no room to breath and it all comes off as crammed and convoluted.

Look at the most recent AT review, the SU thread is three full comment pages long. Thank gods you can minimize it but still, these threads usually end up being the first or second comment, started by the same person, or small group of people, and it borderlines on obsessive.

I took your asking to describe difference to be in response to my comment about SU being "catered to tumblr" and "adult child friendly." I can see how someone would also think AT is tumblr bait.