He did such a good job in that role! How he's kind of in love with the thing that is about to bite his head off.

They lost the tits but kept the sex.

I saw his fake dick, when did we get to see his real dick?

But doesn't much of middle america hate hollywood snobs and sort of love the church?

Hey now, shaved headed women are great. Or am I the only one that went through puberty when he saw Alien 3?

And you people all scorned Google Glass!

Are they that powerful? Like, are hollywood executives calling up the white house and having them bomb Yemen? Are they involved in human trafficking? Are they running kidnappings? When in the fuck did Hollywood Executives get the Mafia Kingpin aura around them? They're a bunch of coked out weasels (from what…

It is exactly why. It is also why he is able to say things with zero substance and build a movement behind it. Most people have examined assumptions about things and they are never asked to un-examine those assumptions (myself included)

Yeah I mean, even Serial Killers have reasons for what they do. That reason mostly being, they are compelled to do it. It is a freak fuck up of variation within evolution. You need as much variety in an organism in order to adapt to future environments; as a result, you get people who like wearing other people's…

Thank god they're at least thinking about it (Damn you Jill Stein!!) It is disheartening when you speak to at least 3 people a day who don't even know what the U.S. Senate is and/or does.

Oh totally (just for clarity, I feel reeally icky posting that) but I think that's kind of the point, they're sadistic fucks. It is the fact that they aren't consenting which gets them off. I mean, I don't know, I haven't look at it much, I imagine there are plenty of criminal psychologists who have studied this…

I read that, he's a fuck.

Gain: Power, dominance, orgasm, thrill, pleasure in someone else's pain/debasement, feeling of total control etc. etc.

As someone who deals with the american electorate on a daily basis, you would be shocked my friend, shocked! at how startlingly ignorant people can be.

Kids still watch Happy Gilmore and Billy Madison? I would imagine his newer shit is what kids know him by, like they know star wars from the prequels first, but that could be a massive assumption on my part.

Well right, I just don't know if A. That is an industry standard (which doesn't make it okay, if it is) and B. If the role is "eye candy for movie" then I don't think there is something inherently wrong with saying "hey, we're looking for eye candy for this role".

and hey, that's okay!

The one does not negate the other. Besides, horny teenage girls probably enjoy ogling eye candy in movie just as much as the boys. I agree that teenage boys need A LOT more proactive teaching in the respecting women department, but I don't think there is anything wrong with titillation in movies.

But porn encompasses all the cultural problems that teen sex comedies do.

But all actors become the 'object' that is their character for the entertainment of those watching the movie. Objectification in of itself is not necessarily morally wrong. That said, the deeply sexist culture we live in usually makes that objectification much more toxic than it needs to be.