The thing is, neither do most people, the people Bob wants to see painting, have those fundamentals. I think criticizing Bob for not having good proportions in his painting is like criticizing Bill Nye the Science Guy for not publishing his findings on baking soda and vinegar volcanoes in a peer reviewed journal.

It's spelled "Kool-Aid".

As someone who really loves watch an episode of Bob Ross every once in a while, and loves watching Bob knock out some good looking landscapes with a minimum of effort, I'm disappointed and dismayed by all the hipster assholes who feel like they need to come in here and shit on something because it's simple and easy to…

Goodness, no. There's at least six.

There's a non-zero chance that wouldn't be ANY more Presidents after Trump.

I consider myself a fairly level headed and well-educated voter, and *I'd* vote for Camacho in a New York minute.

Most.

It would be hard not to. :)

There's no publicity like bad publicity.

It's a lot more casual in the actual screenshot from the film!

I suspect it was the one action scene that played out primarily horizontally, and between the two big name stars, making it a good banner/billboard.

The issue isn't that the villain is winning against the hero. The issue is that the advertising strips everything of context, and straight-up depicts one of the most common domestic violence scenarios out in the middle of a public space.

How about a giant woman with a thick neck?

All the movie versions of the X-Men have power sets that are kind of shit when you compare them to their comic book counterparts.

Yes.

And, by and large, the people with veto power are old, white, male sociopaths.

Leslie Anderson the cricketer?

The guy who played the Wolfman?

Is that a sexual euphemism?

Glayvin!