avclub-ae4e54badbfda78b679ee94b275acc8d--disqus
Don Marz
avclub-ae4e54badbfda78b679ee94b275acc8d--disqus

Sorry! Looks like you missed the boat.

That's what the Church of Scientology said about their spoilers, right?

I love Star Trek!

Presented with brevity through a series of short vignettes, Martin’s fourth book finds the humor in minor tragedies. Like when Martin writes of her split, “I value breaking up with someone because of the time it affords me to contemplate all the bad decisions I’ve made and exploit them for creative content.”

Making something "available" on Hulu is, I'll admit, marginally better than destroying every copy but one and putting that copy in a six-inch-thick titanium-steel safe and breaking the handle off and dropping it into the Marianas Trench.

Zack Snyder's movies are crap and Marvel movies, while entertaining enough, devolve into the same plot in the third act in almost every case, undermining many of them.

He was a busy man!

It can sometimes be fun to play a sandbox game that doesn't murder you with giant bugs if you step off the road at an early level.

That doesn't argue against her point at at all necessarily.

1996? Duke Nukem 3d, Main Theme, 'nuff said.

That sort of makes the character "gay" in that particular production in the same way that Santa Claus "lives at the North Pole".

"Ten years earlier" means about ten years before the year portrayed in the 2009 Star Trek, that's my guess, whether the two are connected or not.

You might want to know the first thing about the topic here before you comment.

I think it's important to remember that Nixon, on top of being a criminal, had no charisma and operated entirely by half-effectively stoking fear of other options.

It's nice to pretend he's playing someone, in anything.

People tend to find mockery less funny when they personally are really into the thing being mocked.

No one is arguing that it should be scored to "You're My Thrill". Good Lord, it's just a mediocre movie, it's not a purist vendetta against it.

The ending's supposed to be exactly that iffy, I think, in the same vein as Inception. That's the point. The odds are that no one will believe this wack rag that only Rorschach seems to read. But since Rorschach is obsessed with telling the whole truth, someone somewhere might manage to piece together that the writer

I agree with the problems with the movie's angle, but the problems with the book's take on the same events are just as bad, in my opinion, when you're serving them to an audience that isn't hip-deep in superheroes. Fake alien from a fake other dimension plus island full of psychics that's never explored past a couple

Moore's major oversight, in my opinion, and yes, I think it likely came out of an assumption based on his own personal views that people would consider an island full of psychics who can alter the consciousness of the entire world as somehow mundane in comparison to Doctor Manhattan.