avclub-aa13379de5ab83d16cd1c4fb5f6bc9e1--disqus
segascream
avclub-aa13379de5ab83d16cd1c4fb5f6bc9e1--disqus

Pretty sure he was the basis for The Master….at least, his look was.

On the plus side, she most likely had to read the first 25 issues or so.

It always bothered me that Lucas' reasoning for not including those deleted scenes was "the quality of the film isn't very good". Somehow, the digital technology to restore scenes that were cut doesn't exist, even though they're able to restore scenes that were cut, as long as they can justify adding a new digital

Munn is fairly hot, yeah…but (even old TechTV/G4 grudges aside), she can't hold a candle to the blessed triumvirate of Morgan Webb, Cat Schwartz, and Megan Morrone. (Though I was always all about Morgan and Cat.)

Back In Action is a series of great parts that spectacularly manage to fail to sum. (Sort of like that was a series of words that somehow JUST manage to not be a sentence that makes any sense at all.) It's got groan-inducing punnery, predictable action, and a gross misuse of Steve Martin, but some pretty good

From a marketing perspective, it's actually damn-near genius to put out this piece of shit 9 years after the original— it's about as far from the original as you can get (so that you've got a whole new audience) without running the risk of getting into the second generation (thereby parents refusing to take their kids

Dick is ALWAYS much better with ideas than execution. Why do you think you can think about sex all day, but you fap for 30 seconds, and it's over?

No, you're confused— that was Hitchhiker's Guide To the Galaxy. Eccentrica Gallumbits.

What I want to know is, why base a movie on a previous movie, when you could go back and re-adapt the source material? Is it a case where the option to the book lies with another studio now, but they're free and clear to remake a film based on book?

Really? The worst? Worse than Bob Dylan's "is this a harmonica or a respirator" solos?

Any of the Scoop tracks are amazing. It's always amazed me that the Keith Moon-era demos that Townshend laid down, Pete always laid down some very subtle, simple drum tracks. Yet the Kenny Jones-era demos that Pete played drums on, he seems to be going for that Moon ferocity. (In particular, compare the demos of

The cover most people go for is the Pearl Jam cover.

Anyone who has an issue with live albums is probably listening to the wrong ones. At one point in my life, I, too, held the idea that live albums sucked, only because at that point, most live albums I'd heard were little more than greatest hits packages with crowd noise faded in/out where appropriate, and therefore

I'm A Boy, Pictures of Lily, Boris The Spider, pretty much every track from Who's Next through Who Are You, Another Tricky Day, Eminence Front, Real Good Lookin Boy (yeah, seriously). Also, their take on Elton John's "Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting" is awesome.

I'd say the whole word next time.

When sinning becomes illegal, only illegals will be sinning.

Not cancelled. It's been put on haitus. It's coming back mid-season as a game show.

"Are all men from the future loud-mouthed braggarts?"

They'll likely be working on that effect clear up to the last possible moment; also, though, B Town is on the right track: Clu is not human; Clu is a program, so it should be pretty easy to disconnect from the Uncanny Valley for the purposes of that character.

Are we all forgetting about the fact that after Travolta's son died, he was ready to leave the church, until they essentially blackmailed him with some "shameful information"?