Oh, I can accept it. I just don't agree.

What's your source?

Right because the govt. can't fake DNA tests. Right?

Can't you use your imagination to see how the story works? If you would you'd save me a lot time explaining it.

Why shouldn't we compare numbers in the appropriate markets?

[Anthony Purcell: So, putting 300 or so stolen corpses in a plane with fake IDs and hastily improvised back stories is totally going to withstand the storm of media and investigative scrutiny that accompany a blown up plane? Sherlock is silly.]
And why do assume that the background stories are "hastily improvised"? I…

The plane idea was completely fathomable. It was based on an old myth that Churchill allowed Coventry to be bombed during WWII and many civilians killed rather than reveal that the allies had broken the Luftwaffe's coded messages by taking extra measures to defend against the attack..

Elementary better than Sherlock?

Am I mistaken or can I prove that Red is not Lizzie's father?

+1

Do they perform autopsies on terminal cancer patients? You do realize most deaths DO NOT get an autopsy without suspicious circumstances or a request/demand from the family.

I don't agree. Red keep insisting that Lizzie should grab his plane and get to her father's side.

[…Red sneers, “I have no interest in cases I have no interest in.” On this show, that’s what passes for a witty line.]

I'm glad someone finally commented on the reviews each week. I was getting a little tired of him telling us every week about how his vision is superior to the work of people ACTUALLY CREATING A SHOW.