I would gladly pleasure Vincent Kartheiser, for he is chicken done right, but I cannot abide sullying the Colonel's memory like this.

When the state or mob decides who is "marginalized" or "disenfranchised" then they can also take it away. I find it interesting that it is permissible to call Ann Coulter a "cunt" on national television but if one said such a thing of Hillary Clinton, they are "sexist" and "misogynist". Al Sharpton gets work ginning…

Everyone assumes I am "of the Right" just because I don't agree with their silly collegiate virtue signaling. My problem is the hypocrisy of the "news" not reporting news but either trying to sell movie tickets to their movies through "reporting" or impress their social agenda upon you.

Again, I need to make clear I am neither voting for Clinton nor Trump.

I think the government has no right to interfere in private contracts between consenting parties.

I'm not gay. I am androphilic.

Lyndon Johnson made his cabinet watch him take a shit. He routinely banged girls on the Oval Office sofa and sometimes the desk.

I didn't say anything alarmist. And I am hardly retarded. The moral decline is occurring like it did in all the great civilizations. After a period of affluence, the populace becomes slack and devoted to self-love and pleasure. In this case, it occurred first in the 1920s and then since the 1960s.

No, what he did was bad, 11 years later, is because he is close to defeating the Chosen One by the oligarchy.

Yes, only when he is not making money for the network anymore is this conveniently remarked upon by the "news".

What a bunch of hypocrites. Long ago they've dumped objective morality, the Judeo-Christian tradition, anything remotely religious, ethical, or moral. The entire entertainment and "news" complex has been working to destroy conventional morality for years. Now they are all atwitter because of something said a decade…

It ends up costing the same if you buy it or print it. You still need reliable card stock or laminating. A trip to Kinkos might even run you more.

I'd argue Apples to Apples is more difficult because you need to figure out what the person will pick as the best answer. This is tough because you play with a wider age group as opposed to Cards against Humanity.

I love MadLibs. Not all the time, but I think that is hilarious. You get the right people and a good bag of weed, hilarity ensues.

Don't forget Sleeper.

For me, it is the same reason I like British quiz shows: I like seeing comedians think on their feet. I prefer clever turns of phrase more than vulgarian humor. I do like referent humor also. Paul F. Tompkins and Greg Proops come to mind as people who crack me up on there. Emo Phillips is really, really funny on there…

Is news so impoverished that The New York Times must resort to writing a 271 word litany on a silly card game?

My grandmother would have laughed her ass off at Cards Against Humanity. She was a hoot and cheated at cards when you played her. And she'd laugh and laugh. Oh, I miss her.

I enjoyed the game, having played it only once.

"Tunnel of Love" was a fantastic song and so different for Springsteen. I love that song, but the album (just dated myself) didn't do it for me.