OK, and now for the truth:

The attribution goes to the research of the original author, and if certain narrative style points (such as the Lincoln has 4 days to live bit) is borrowed from the book. Events may be public record, but that doesn't mean much. The original book condensed that public record into a narrative that makes it easier to…

They aren't yelling racist things. It's only racist if you ascribe any legitimate opposition to a black president as racist because he's black. That's intellectually dishonest. The real racism is falling back on the president's race to try to justify his horrible policies.

Aside from the obvious bias and the reviewer completely buying into (or continuing to push) the false narrative the left wants to circulate about Fox News, O'Reilly and the Tea Party, there's plenty in this review that gives it almost no credibility.