avclub-940ab893dd2c5824ae83efa90790f2d7--disqus
sixsevenfiftysix
avclub-940ab893dd2c5824ae83efa90790f2d7--disqus

Something that, in this comment chain at least, only Kaingerc did. So I'm not sure why it was interjected.

I'm pretty proud of that.

I believe that the post you're replying to quite directly stated this.

It's been lost in the weeds of this controversy but literally no one is arguing on behalf of this. Blame Tinder for the bad headline. You can set different options in the app, including variations such as "transgender"/"trans" and "questioning" which are not genders. You can set it to anything you want.

Some people care that both Jost's and your joke have been made many many times prior and some do not.

I haven't done anything nice yet today so I'll explain to you for your benefit why this went badly for you. From my first comment, which while in response to your comment was not particularly addressed at you, you assumed I was a complete idiot. If you ask me, you did so for no reason. Therefore, by you doing that, I

I know the 2008 primaries are a distant memory we would all long to return to after this year, but Barack Obama overcoming the DNC's favor for Clinton was kind of the main story of the election. Remember, there's no arguing that the DNC is not biased in favor of certain candidates, it's literally an encoded part of

Again, MADE her famous. Being famous isn't like when after you're president they still call you President whatever. It can be given and it can be revoked.

I can't even count how many assumptions of yours are apparently things "we kind of do know." But regardless, the DNC has been biasing things in favor of HRC a lot longer than since 2008.

Uh… ok. So I know a lot of us Hillary people, when we hear about "the emails," we instantly think of the fabricated private server controversy. But I am going to let you in on a lesser-known fact that there are also other "the emails" that now are a matter of public record thanks to a small nation-state formerly known

I remember that this woman was famous for a time but I don't really remember what for and I am pretty sure we can all agree that she is no longer famous. Do we need to care about every person suspended from Twitter?

Good, because that's not what I was referring to at all.

Finally? It was stated loudly and repeatedly when it was first announced.

In fact, this change of Tinder is the exact opposite of what would bother you. Under the new system, you can restrict yourself to seeing only the gender(s) that you prefer. Before, someone only interested in one gender would be expected to recognize the other ones.

I have pointed out in quite a few places that Tinder has not added any genders but simply allowed you to list different things in the gender field. For example, "questioning" is an option. But "questioning" is not a gender. Tinder, I suspect, willfully worded the update in such a way to attract this attention.

Fortunately, I don't consider this a conversation.

There aren't 37. They are mostly different terms for the same thing/equivalent terms for FTM and MTF. Tinder just gave everyone the clickbaity headline upfront.

You're right and the reports about what Tinder has done are incredibly misleading (a report that started with Tinder itself).

I think the fault being implicated in this is the same kind of fault that can be applied to Clinton. Simply because he didn't apply it in this case does not mean he, or people agreeing with him, don't believe that.

You're correct. Towards you I have no good faith. The comment I posted was posted in good faith because it wasn't addressed to you. Your first comment was assuming bad faith and thus that is how the dialogue has continued.