Once again, I literally said exactly that myself in the post you replied to, so I don't think it is that impressive that you are only now realizing it.

I'm quite positive that in my second paragraph I stated that I did not believe the first paragraph to be true.

I don't think you know what biasing means. The DNC did not put its candidates on a level playing field. Would the result have been different if they had? Fundamentally we have no way of knowing the answer to that question.

Rednecks laugh at You Might Be a Redneck jokes. In fact, they are the only demographic that does laugh at them.

Or maybe it's simply another consequence of something which we know to be true—the DNC biased its primary?

I think everything in this post is exactly wrong. Non-normative genders aren't being mocked at all while scolding liberals are. Additionally, that was the explanation offered by the person who made the joke.

1) "SJW" does not equal "people concerned with social justice."

This comment chain is plainly about SJWs and not any one racial group or sexuality/gender-identifiers. Stop inventing enemies.

Once again, I'm not acting like anything, you've chosen to read the words this way. This internet discussion board is not a conversation between you and I and thus I am not trying to converse with your singular perspective.

None of the letters in LGBT are a gender. Although one of the "gender options" (not a gender) on Tinder is transgender.

Funnily enough, you just ignored that "You Might Be a Redneck" jokes are actually TARGETED AT "rednecks," a group which enjoys laughing at themselves. As a self-identifying SJW I wish the same could be said for our lot.

I was not trying to do any of the above. Similarly, there are some important things that you are not trying to do, such as re-evaluate your position in this discussion (which you are having with your own invented figure).

You're right to be confused "Tinder adds 37 genders" isn't what happened, at all, even though it's what Tinder's PR said happened.

There is literally no way that Tinder is a target below SNL Weekend Update. That the joke is being called punching down shows that people don't understand the joke or don't understand what punching down means.

No one is pretending that. You're pretending you've never seen anyone on the left say it as if it weren't.

No it doesn't. It doesn't sound like anything, because they were words that you read and decided to interpret that way, wrongly. Similar to how you wrongly interpreted the joke to have anything to do whatsoever with sexuality.

Please see the fact that there's literally no sane person on earth who would take my comment as a literal statement of my belief…?

The wildcard in this controversy is that "Tinder added 37 gender options" is a horrible misrepresentation of what the app now allows. Now, users can list whatever they would like as their gender. 37 options have been added, including things like "trans man" (or woman), "transgender," and "trans". They aren't all…

The fact that people have interpreted Jost's joke to be about "sexuality having many facets [having] caused the Democrats to lose" is why Democrats lost.

Heck, it does!