Maybe the character really is CGI, like in the context of the story.

No wait stop…. I was kidding…. oh, what have I done?

I'm pretty sure it goes:

You know what's an awesome movie that I just recently watched again?  Groundhog Day.  Shit that was a good movie.  "Yeah, I know Rita.  They're hicks."

*Pushes up nerd glasses*

I'm sure some of our MPs would like to.  But no, they're much sneakier about such things.  They don't give hate filled speeches about gays or anything.  They just quietly pass innocent sounding bills that are essentially SOPA and the Patriot Act, but because it's Canada, people assume we're some socialist, progressive…

Shit man, Canada's quietly turning into a teaparty-like shithole a lot faster than the States.  (BTW, don't worry about archiving this post av club, it's probably already on some CSIS servers).

Don't forget the gynecologist's surgeon buddy essentially asking him how tight he should make it using his fingers as a gauge while the surgery was being done.

But in book form, it's just 'The Godfather'.

Yeah, thinking back on the pilot, it was like an entire season (or two even) of plot in one episode…  character intros, cancer diagnosis, intro to meth trade, decision to cook meth, meeting Jesse, convincing Jesse to cook meth, cooking meth, trying unsuccessfully to sell own meth, finding wholesale buyer, buyer…

Yeah, I pretty much just remember individual episodes for their endings.  I can go through a season and think 'which episode was this one?  Oh yeah, it ended with Tony leaving Janice's after pissing her off.'

It's true, one of the shows that most asked for season long, consistent arcs was also one in which each season was the most disjointed and crazy.  I always wonder how much trouble it would actually have been for the writers to sit down and at least very loosely sketch out the story for a given season.  

Holy man, I started reading the comments on that and it got pretty damn nasty.  The reply thread to one dude's comment about granting their wish features the greatest trolling I've ever seen.

Ah, dammit.  I forgot.

A.  that's two reasons.

The 'Desperate' kind of housewives.

*playfully slaps Big Fat Face in his big fat face*

In one of the revisions they shot at nearly the same time.  Which, from Han's point of view, is just as amoral as shooting first.  However, it's still stupid from the audience's point of view because Greedo just sucks in that version.

You guys, he never said David Prowse, he clearly has Sebastion Shaw in his comment.  You guys are confused.

So, I'm confused.  Do Objectivists not believe in inheritances?  I mean, I can see where they're coming from because giving Paris Hilton the same shot as a poor person doesn't seem fair, but where do they propose that all that wealth goes when the person dies?  To the (nonexistent) government?