avclub-8f4a6a0a965dc69af2ed56551030df94--disqus
Windy Shrimp
avclub-8f4a6a0a965dc69af2ed56551030df94--disqus

I really liked Vic too.  but i'm a super cheese-ball, so maybe you are too?

yes, agreed on your last point.  like 'in the cards', a really good episode made super great by its positioning within the story arc and the season.  they needed these 'character' stories to balance out the action stuff

yes, agreed on your last point.  like 'in the cards', a really good episode made super great by its positioning within the story arc and the season.  they needed these 'character' stories to balance out the action stuff

ditto to the main thesis of the thread.  lufton was ok, and the character of jake was important to build sisko's world.  i really like jake as a character and as a 'person'. young people are often awkward idiots, so even jake's weirder moments ring true.

ditto to the main thesis of the thread.  lufton was ok, and the character of jake was important to build sisko's world.  i really like jake as a character and as a 'person'. young people are often awkward idiots, so even jake's weirder moments ring true.

no kill jake!

no kill jake!

On the flip side of all of this, there are those people happy to walk around MOMA or something talking about "How is this ART my 5 year old could do this! yadda yadda…  This anti-elitist reaction (which i myself have had) should also be discouraged - it's worth trying to understand and consider why some weird things

On the flip side of all of this, there are those people happy to walk around MOMA or something talking about "How is this ART my 5 year old could do this! yadda yadda…  This anti-elitist reaction (which i myself have had) should also be discouraged - it's worth trying to understand and consider why some weird things

"The art world is a game rich people play to look cultured my friend"

"The art world is a game rich people play to look cultured my friend"

@epignosis567:disqus no one person can define art.  That very fact is, i'd argue, one of the main definitions of art. (ahem)

@epignosis567:disqus no one person can define art.  That very fact is, i'd argue, one of the main definitions of art. (ahem)

that is the art - you experienced it in a way that reflected your own internal thoughts, concerns and preoccupations (and, meow, limitations?)

that is the art - you experienced it in a way that reflected your own internal thoughts, concerns and preoccupations (and, meow, limitations?)

something something suck it

something something suck it

true for europeans too - interbred with neanderthals. So sub-species we, too.

then who was review?

then who was review?