Too bad the real Wild West was boring as shit.
Too bad the real Wild West was boring as shit.
No, that will come with the Skyrim review that will arrive in two months or so. It will get a B- for having a world that's "too big" and dragons that "breathe fire too much."
Nice to see this grade. Been getting a lot of mixed (or plain old bad) reviews. But I generally trust the AV Club's judgment, so will be checking this out.
Not in the military, nice try. Started out as a gimmick poster a few years ago, now just a regular poster.
I was fully expecting that Kirk Cameron sad birthday photo on this article.
One of his biggest criticisms in this review is the lack of advancement. One expects sequels to advance from one to the next. So if game 1 was great, and game 2 was exactly the same, but improvements and refinements were expected, then game 2 would naturally receive a lower score.
Then scroll on over to IGN's multi-page masturbatory "review." It should have all the sentences you need.
God damnit, Sammi.
lol
Different dude wrote the Gears review.
HAHAHAHA
I could take your post more seriously if you would format your posts in a readable manner.
Wait…how is it that they only played 5 minutes but made it all the way to the ocean liner level?
The AV Club having "unconventional" reviews is old news. Just get over it and enjoy the acidic commentary that ensues.
Jesus christ. You're defending Drake like he's some sort of controversial freedom fighter that needs justification.
Now seeing that this game gets a C due to it being a retread, I am really curious to see what BF3 will get, because if any game is a retread of the last, BF3 is it.
I wouldn't be all that surprised if a Skyrim review took two months. There will likely be so much damn content in that game, it would likely take that long to complete a full review.
Ha!
CGI Zombie TIgers?
But then the fish would probably get zombified, and then how fucked would we be?