They did a great job of making Bjorn look imposing in that scene. He looked like he could have torn Erlender and Kalf apart without breaking a sweat.

It was great the way they did that, however. Showing the Norse Winter Solstice festival being closer to how we celebrate Christmas then the French version, with England about half way in between.

Not to mention the fact that there was no Klan when slavery was still legal, nor a need for one. The purpose of the Klan was to be racist, murdering assholes but to protect your identity. In a country where black people were property there was no need for the anonymity. The Klan didn't exist until after the war.

Blues Brothers: 133 minutes
Something About Mary: 119 Minutes
Animal House: 109 Minutes
Caddy Shack: 98 Minutes
Princess Bride: 98 Minutes
Dr. Strangelove: 95 Minutes
Blazing Saddles: 93 Minutes
Monty Python and the Holy Grail: 91 Minutes
Airplane: 88 minutes
There is no "right" length for a comedy, and there's no…

But if they'd cut that scene with Chris Evert, Matthew Broderick and Marv Albert then Chris Evert, Matthew Broderick and Marv Albert wouldn't have been in the movie.

I listened to the WTF, but the whole episode was Cohen talking about almost getting arrested trying to film stuff. That doesn't make the results good - gonzo porn directors almost get arrested filming stuff too. Borat was great because under the male nudity and bathroom humor it was showing us something terrible…

And her CGI nudity.

Or basically telling the entire movie plot, ala Batman vs. Superman.

We're clearly supposed to be on Jimmy's side, just like we were supposed to be on Walter White's side, but that doesn't make Chuck wrong, just a total dick. Don't you get the feeling from the way Howard acts around Chuck that he was a tyrant of a boss. Howard making lame excuses for why they recommended Jimmy to the…

Well it can be both. Here's Jimmy at a job Chuck doesn't think he should have trying to figure out how to get clients without soliciting them after Chuck's questioning. So does Jimmy do the right thing and make a commercial and then run it by the partners - which based on his visit to Cliff's office he absolutely…

Unfortunately it's most noticeable in Jonathan Banks. Based on how he looks in BCS he'd have been close to 80 by the time he buys it on BB. But I'm willing to suspend a little bit of disbelief - after all Gus would never have been able to adjust that tie.

I agree with Dixon. I don't think he was ever an alcoholic - he may have started drinking more heavily when his son died and then used that reputation in the plan to get his revenge.

It's pretty clear Chuck is much older than Jimmy. I wonder if their parents may have died while Jimmy was still a kid and Chuck was off in law school or whatever. That's why Chuck constantly bailed Jimmy out because he's guilty over leaving him, and why Jimmy sees Chuck as such a father figure rather than a brother.

The 75 year old Earl will warn the children not to go into the Wardrobe in Barrow's old room.

Poor little George dies on the shores of Dunkirk and throws the Downton House into another heredity crisis.

I wondered, and I'm sure I could look it up, if Allen Leech wanted to leave the show and that's why he moved to America -then when they announced it was the last season he was willing to come back, he just didn't want to be stuck in that role for the next five years.
It does seem like Findley and Stevens have both…

Exactly, they're kind of smashing about 150 years together anyway. Alfred the Great was born 40+ years after Ecbert died, Count Odo should be about 25 years old - not what 60? and let's not forget that Ragnar may not have actually existed at all. Sure there's sagas about him - but there are also Saga's of Sigurd…

"I make more fucking money selling rotting milk then you'll see in your whole life!"

She could be anything. I thought they might be alluding to the Norse forays into North America and she was native American. Ragnar's curiosity has always been his greatest strength. I'm sure he'll ask her as he's doing her.

Remember Jimmy's statement at the end of, then again the beginning of this year - that he would never let that happen again (not take the money but more generally let the "right thing" interfere with what he ultimately wants.) I think there's a part of Jimmy that's pulling a long con on Chuck to get back at him for…