You realize the "men's rights" subreddit is pretty much saying the same stuff as Rosin, right?

You realize the "men's rights" subreddit is pretty much saying the same stuff as Rosin, right?

I have only seen the pilot at this point, but I found it both legitimately scary and an endearingly campy trainwreck. There were a lot of creepy, disturbing elements, but it was all so over-the-top. It was like condensing ten horror movies into one.

I have only seen the pilot at this point, but I found it both legitimately scary and an endearingly campy trainwreck. There were a lot of creepy, disturbing elements, but it was all so over-the-top. It was like condensing ten horror movies into one.

He was OK, but mostly because the criminals rarely tried to fight back and Dog would just mace them in the face. One episode, a huge mob decided to actually attack Dog and his son. In the ensuing panic, Dog sprayed mace in everyone's (including his son's) face, then (literally) jumped into his car and drove off while…

He was OK, but mostly because the criminals rarely tried to fight back and Dog would just mace them in the face. One episode, a huge mob decided to actually attack Dog and his son. In the ensuing panic, Dog sprayed mace in everyone's (including his son's) face, then (literally) jumped into his car and drove off while…

Ridley Scott didn't have to direct anything. Directors aren't required to follow every last letter of the script, especially when they are as established and powerful as Scott. For every lame nonsensical plot point in that film, there were probably ten more in the script that he discarded.

Ridley Scott didn't have to direct anything. Directors aren't required to follow every last letter of the script, especially when they are as established and powerful as Scott. For every lame nonsensical plot point in that film, there were probably ten more in the script that he discarded.

It was actually surprisingly good. Check it out.

It was actually surprisingly good. Check it out.

There is a distinction. Nobody is ever wrong in liking or disliking a movie, but their interpretations of a film can be wrong. Whether you like a film is an entirely subjective matter, whereas interpreting a film deals with objectivity at least to a degree.

There is a distinction. Nobody is ever wrong in liking or disliking a movie, but their interpretations of a film can be wrong. Whether you like a film is an entirely subjective matter, whereas interpreting a film deals with objectivity at least to a degree.

But what Vick did was way worse than anything Brown, Richards or Gibson did. No amount of jail-time could atone for the things he did. Not only did he kill dogs, but he had them torture and rape each other. This was all entirely premeditated. That's worse than beating someone in a fit of rage.

But what Vick did was way worse than anything Brown, Richards or Gibson did. No amount of jail-time could atone for the things he did. Not only did he kill dogs, but he had them torture and rape each other. This was all entirely premeditated. That's worse than beating someone in a fit of rage.

The sequel to the original was actually pretty great. It had Leatherface doing drive-by chainsawings and the family winning cook-offs with their "mystery" chili. It was akin to following up Halloween with Michael and Laurie going on a wacky road-trip together, but was entertaining nonetheless.

The sequel to the original was actually pretty great. It had Leatherface doing drive-by chainsawings and the family winning cook-offs with their "mystery" chili. It was akin to following up Halloween with Michael and Laurie going on a wacky road-trip together, but was entertaining nonetheless.

Yeah, this movie is hilarious. Some older comedies don't hold up, but Abbot and Costello are still hilarious.

Yeah, this movie is hilarious. Some older comedies don't hold up, but Abbot and Costello are still hilarious.

In that case, would you have any problem with someone feeling disgust or shame at the thought of sex between two people of the same sex?

In that case, would you have any problem with someone feeling disgust or shame at the thought of sex between two people of the same sex?