I love that Cary's a douchebag. He doesn't have a moral compass; he's doing his job, the same way the defence are. He's not evil but he's not good, and that's what a good legal show gets. The Prosecutor is NOT an avenging angel. They're a group of people doing a job, and a job that orientates them towards proof but…

True, but in the moment when House dosed the patient so that he couldn't donate, there was no proof anything was wrong with him. Allll the other doctors didn't think there was anything wrong with him. House couldn't prove it was anything more than dehydration.

It really wasn't clear there was anything wrong with him.

He's been balding for decades now. It's just American TV doesn't like that so much.

I know it would have been unethical to take the kidney, but like Dworkin said, when principles collide one may be used but they both stay in tact.

True that Wilson probably wouldn't know.

I haven't seen anyone do it but it doesn't make sense, IT'S CLEARLY VELMA. Costume designers, they put all this effort into their jokes and nobody shows the love.

I think that was the point. It was an innocent person, but the justice system came very close to fucking him over completely. There are innocent people in prison.

The other episode with the same problem didn't have the altruism as a symptom.

Good episode. Really love that storyline for Diane. Always good to see lawyers doing decent things.

I kind of like the idea of Foreman just bringing the sexy along with him, a couple of minutes each episode.

If the Dean ever gets to kiss Jeff, I will applaud for him.

Gratuitous? Sure. It looked like an X-rated muppet show with all the smiling and hugging before and after the kiss, just in case someone in the audience may have missed Wilde and her ladyfriend.

Well, at least you're admitting that you're being fucking sanctimonious. Okay, there were some other things in the episode. It still wasn't great. You haven't pointed out anything great either.

… Which one was incorrect? Reference to Shirley's religiousness was her very predictable freaking out about Britta getting high as well as her apron.

You called what I got from the episode "shallow"; then you talked about the "real" revelations. Ergo, it seemed that you were trying to say that these revelations that you found meant something, or were "deep" rather than "shallow".

Yeah but the jokes weren't set up around the fixed points or the divergent points; they just did the same things with no added revelation of a joke, and the divergent points didn't complement each other very much.

Replying here to your comment directly above.

:( But I don't. I don't even care about being your "enemy". Oh noes.

Thank you for explaining this to me, but I must say, how are those… revelations?