Are you a gimmick commenter or is your faux intellectual speak ("your loyalty is to be applauded but not your critical faculties") for real?

Thank god, their arbitrary 2 a week conventional review style made absolutely no sense for this.
(and neither did Todd's allatonceandthenalightningfastreview)

WHOA!

Terry Crews is gold in everything.

@avclub-de9240f5c623bf031dcf0fca9770db44:disqus You got the wrong actress there man.

Well he did need the stepladder he was seen buying while on the phone with Michael in a later episode (and then carrying going back to the gate when busted by Maeby in another later episode).

It's not a montage of his acting reel, it IS his acting reel, so the shoddy editing is the reel.

Sure, don't marathon the whole thing in one sitting and then vomit out a review. But applying the same review analysis (week by week, no hindsight) that is applied to broadcast shows to a production that is in no way designed to be watched like that makes no sense whatsoever.

Didn't find the butter funny, but Carl Weathers' Swappigans was gold.

That C is going to haunt them in later years.

Telling you, in 5 years when this is being re-reviewed, the gimmick commenter account named "Re-posted original AD4 AVClub review snippits" is going to be HILARIOUS.

Awesome.

It's the whole institution of episodic TV reviewing that seems to be thrown by these Netflix shows. They have entrenched ways of analyzing and criticizing works that don't really apply to stuff like AD season 4.

Wow, that would be an epic joke.

On the other other hand: Neil Gaiman is married to Amanda Palmer. Anyone who would willingly put up with her every day does not have a valid opinion anymore.

Looks like someone's gearing themselves up for a roofie circle!

No, he says "I can't reach the chachi" while demonstrating that he can't reach the gate handle on the other side.

Give it a chance to be something other than the Arrested Development you were expecting, there's so much comedy brilliance in there.

Absolutely. I can't believe that they're still reviewing it as a single-camera sitcom (which the other 3 seasons were). It's a new type of structure, actually designed to get funnier as you watch it, rewatch it, discuss it, look stuff up about it, etc. That's why so many of the jokes and storylines are so buried and…

Right and the fact that the show was NOT released like that makes this false review format (treating it as a conventional week-to-week sitcom) invalid. It's like setting arbitrary time limits on yourself for reading a book and then complaining that sections don't make any sense before reading further.