avclub-84897987d99c64376bbf9ce8142b6446--disqus
questions88
avclub-84897987d99c64376bbf9ce8142b6446--disqus

This episode made me shake my head so hard it hurts…

My point is a little realism wouldn't have hurt. Ainsley Hayes clearly espoused
Republican values like small government and antifeminism, while
demonstrating her "firm grasp of right and wrong" and professional
neutrality at all times. If Sorkin
wants to cast Will as a similar character, we need to be shown some
evidenc

My point is a little realism wouldn't have hurt. Ainsley Hayes clearly espoused
Republican values like small government and antifeminism, while
demonstrating her "firm grasp of right and wrong" and professional
neutrality at all times. If Sorkin
wants to cast Will as a similar character, we need to be shown some
evidenc

Why did Sorkin feel the need to write Will as a Republican? I understand that it's supposed to lend him more credibility when criticizing the right…but come one, has Will exhibited conservative views on a single issue? Someone can't be written as a Republican just because you declare he is. Is Sorkin that bad at

Why did Sorkin feel the need to write Will as a Republican? I understand that it's supposed to lend him more credibility when criticizing the right…but come one, has Will exhibited conservative views on a single issue? Someone can't be written as a Republican just because you declare he is. Is Sorkin that bad at

I have a super basic question that has been bothering me for a very long time…

double post

Didn't get an answer last time so I'll try again:

Didn't get an answer last time so I'll try again:

Re: Sloan's "lesson" on financial deregulation…

For a guy who has no reservations about framing left vs. right as the educated elite vs. the illiterate rube (see Bartlet vs. Ritchie in TWW), Sorkin is either a hypocrite or shameless.

For a guy who has no reservations about framing left vs. right as the educated elite vs. the illiterate rube (see Bartlet vs. Ritchie in TWW), Sorkin is either a hypocrite or shameless.

Why does Will say "Mubarak resigned after 18 days of unprecedented pro-democracy protests" in the opening scene, which was set on Feb 10, 2011, and then follows it up with "but in a 17 minute address, Mubarak announced that he wouldn't be stepping down"?

Why does Will say "Mubarak resigned after 18 days of unprecedented pro-democracy protests" in the opening scene, which was set on Feb 10, 2011, and then follows it up with "but in a 17 minute address, Mubarak announced that he wouldn't be stepping down"?

Just finished this episode and have another rudimentary question…

Just finished this episode and have another rudimentary question…

I have a very rudimentary question, and I know this is not the right episode. But this is the most recent review so I'm hoping it will provide the best chance for this question to be answered.

I have a very rudimentary question, and I know this is not the right episode. But this is the most recent review so I'm hoping it will provide the best chance for this question to be answered.

I'm not a lawyer, but…isn't there one big flaw in logic everyone is overlooking?

I'm not a lawyer, but…isn't there one big flaw in logic everyone is overlooking?