The Playstation store has a surprisingly diverse selection, although often I'm more surprised by what isn't there. I think I tried to rent Dallas Buyers Club the other day and it wasn't available anymore.

Why is the law school suing him? The MPAA sure has its tentacles everywhere.

Did Archmage's mute spell recently wear off or something? I feel like I hadn't seen you around here in a really long time. Did you take an AVClub break?

Crackle is confusing in how limited its content is. There's barely anything on it, and most of the ads are often for other Crackle shows.

I didn't read your comment carefully before commenting. However, after rereading it I still don't really understand what you're saying.

Institutional of its era? It was made in 2008, not 1950.

I hear he'll make $1,000,000,000,000 if he makes it to Avengers 3.

I rewatched Iron Man and while I recall enjoying the hell out of it in the theatre something about literally every woman in that movie existing as an object sort of bothered me. Paltrow is the only woman with any speaking lines, and pretty much every other women in the movie was a stripper/seductive sexy flight…

It's funny that even when hiring the elite of top Hollywood directors in the realm of two hundred million dollar movies there is so little interest in artistry and quality control that the studio can low-ball salaries on the basis that someone else will do it for that price if their first choice won't. It's like…

This sounds like a really fucked up, toxic relationship where you will soon find yourself raising a child you don't want with a woman who views you as a baby maker. Just get divorced before its too late man, you don't need this shit.

Unless, of course, we learn the fifty five accusers are responsible for fifty five separate lies and are making it up. But that will never happen. Three lies, that's possible. Thirty seven lies, there's an outside chance. But fifty five lies? I'd like to see that!

That was a particularly egregious entry.

I love this attitude. One party says something shitty. The party at whom the shitty comment is directed expresses their opinion on the other person's shittiness. The offending party tells the other party to stop being outraged and dismisses them completely. Basically it's tantamount to telling them to eat shit and…

When the attitude of a business is that they don't care who they offend or how people feel about their product, they are going to be in for a bad surprise. And you're the one actually being histrionic when you talk about indulging outrage, which has zero nexus to the actual conversation happening. And dismissing the…

It's funny to you because something you holder fairly dear and personal is not being attacked. I'm not religious but my wife is, and believe it or not you would never in a million years guess it from talking to her because she's not the cartoon figure of an evangelist that we're used to seeing portrayed in the media.…

The fact that you are, personally, brazen and vocal about things you think are stupid is completely and totally irrelevant to the issue of whether it makes any fucking sense at all for a publication to actively target a large portion of its membership for ridicule. If the AVClub wants to be that, then they obviously…

It's interesting that you can't see the obvious poor decision involved in a website alienating what is presumably a large segment of its readers. It's tantamount to telling religious people they don't belong here. I mean, yeah, Teti can do whatever he wants, he's the editor, but is this a smart choice?

Yeah, I'm pretty firmly agnostic and this seems to be in clear bad taste. Are they trying to alienate readers? It's just an odd choice.

I think we need to retire the "surprising absolutely no one" headline.

Whoa, whoa, whoa. You get a firstie on a review this big, and you actually discuss the topic? Delete this right now and replace it with a gag. And if you're stretched for time you can always just do an ironic firstie; "The First Awakens" will do.