What about American Idiot?
What about American Idiot?
It's not even circa 2016, but the Onion report after Obama's win in 2012 is the best election content of the year.
*taps microphone*
Addressing the United Nations on Women's Rights issues…
Hell, their b-sides record is one of the best albums of the brit-pop era.
But he is suspicious of Dolores' behaviour; that was the entire point of the scene.
I am here to tell all you vegetarian nerds that meat is the best food. Suck it if you don't think so.
Nah meat is good.
Sure, but in a culture slurry like Westworld—where the player piano does Nine Inch Nails, Shakespeare is shorthand for "kill all humans", and the creator of the western theme park is named Robert Ford… the superficial similarities are enough to at lease pique interest.
The Lost pilot is one of the most critically acclaimed television episodes of all-time but cool for you I guess.
There is an article somewhere on the internet detailing the vfx work done to enhance the mechanical nature of his performance. They are starting and stopping his motion in post.
Do you think that character was scripted and cast to be played by a black actor, specifically?
Push your pseudoscientific racism pamphlet on somebody else please. (And fuck off in general.)
The comment in the review was not a deep examination of the scene, as admitted by the reviewer. It was a stray observation, like so many other stray observations in so many other reviews intended to stoke conversation.
The idea is that Dolores' timelines are happening concurrently on screen.
The is a deliberate wide shot of Dolores in the cemetery alone, followed by a cut to reveal William behind her.
For whatever reason there's a bizarre tendency in popular culture to treat "Intentionally Ambiguous" as "This Is A Puzzle To Solve", which it obviously is not. (See also: The Sopranos finale)
Doubling down on the racism, eh? Well you've persuaded me!
"Projecting my politics onto the show" seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do, quite frankly. Westworld isn't made for me and only me, but I'm watching it, and I'm free to interact with it however I choose.
Let me try again (and I'll address the edit you made to your comment to make it seem like you were being more direct): This is a critical review of a piece of art designed to provoke thought and conversation. Just because you didn't think the scene in question was important or had anything to say doesn't mean it was…