avclub-75e09880173bc8111bccdc7d68c740bb--disqus
misterseize
avclub-75e09880173bc8111bccdc7d68c740bb--disqus

He was on a late night show a couple days ago (Kimmel, I believe) and he looked awful. Definitely taking that idolization of Keith Richards thing a bit too far.

Where exactly is the harm in an actor exploiting his fame to bring attention to his music, paintings, writing, etc.? The worst that can happen is that the art is bad. I would imagine the majority of these actors-turned-musicians are bankrolling their own musical projects anyway. The spoils of success.

With some effort, I've finally managed to get through this train wreck of an interview.

With all due respect, it tells me you might be using the word "genius" a bit loosely.

Based on your comments here, clarity doesn't appear to be your strong suit. Cheers.

Because your statement is false, that's why not.

It's not "my" definition. Also, regardless of the first comment in the thread being about China, your initial comment was that "there's straight-up slavery in the US," so that's what I was responding to.

one-sixteenth cherokee

Couldn't get through his first monologue.

Slavery means there's a system in place that allows a person to be legally owned as chattel. So whatever you're referring to isn't slavery as it's traditionally defined. There are only a few places left in the world that actually have slavery as a quasi-legitimate institution (in the form of debt bondage, for

Where exactly in the United States is it possible to legally own another human being for the purpose of indentured servitude?

Easily? Like, where you hold legal title to them and everything? Really?

Kidding aside, he really did. It was kind of a hit too.

Sure, just a sec…

Which is odd, considering that he performed a solo spoken-word show on a 36-city nationwide tour less than two years ago.

Pretty sure no one will be making that comment in response to this news item.

well done

Not sure what that means. Oh well. Enjoy your day.

oh my god what a retort that was

Come on. The line is obviously positioned to be more than just a "mention." It's clearly intended to be a Big Reveal. Otherwise, she would've simply introduced the person as "my fiancee Rhea" right off the bat. Thing is, I'm 100% certain no one in this forum is shocked or offended by the idea of a lesbian couple,