A movie that's pro-Christianity doesn't necessarily have to be "preachy." "Rudy" is a great example, and it was very successful. And I would definitely call it a secular movie as well. But for some reason, movies like that are few and far between.

Haven't seen Unbroken. And I assume your citing Indiana Jones movies is a joke. But, more importantly, I never said religious people are ignored. I said they're more often than not portrayed negatively.

Your second paragraph suggests that there may be a large, largely untapped audience out there for well made, well funded movies that don't treat religious people like fools, hypocrites, zealots, and/or perverts like the majority of movies and TV shows do these days. If a poorly made movie can sell lots of tickets…

if you wanted to come across as super cool, mission accomplished, dude.

did you just say "the commoner?"

And the wisdom to surround himself with charismatic performers because of this.

Also, a chance to do steroids with Joe Piscopo.

Geena Davis is gonna be pissed!!

Tough call. It's somewhat similar to "Cool" and "The Stick," but probably more similar to "The Walk" and "Wild and Loose." So probably the second album.

According to my research, it was the LM-1 Drum Computer, which was a predecessor of the LinnDrum. That specific beat (from "777-9311") was programmed by the drummer from Tower of Power.

"Uptown Funk" is most reminiscent of the Time's pre-Paisley Park albums.

Wait. So when the genre peaked way back when, it was still neither exciting or dynamic?

Specifically which parts were prerecorded on the Ronson SNL performance? Since that's what we're discussing.

So, your complaint is that they sound like a talented group playing songs from an exciting, dynamic genre?

Prince was okay, but Ronson's appearance was superior. Better songs, better performances, more energy.

She won my respective category, if you know what I'm saying.

"…the officials aren't privy to that information gleaned from replay."

"Well, you were just a couple of feet from the play, unlike the guy who threw the flag, who was about sixty feet away, so we'll defer to you, in an effort to make the most accurate call possible."

"…if you were going to play the odds on who's more likely to be right given disagreement between the near and far officials, the far away official is a massive underdog."

No, they don't. There are many calls where the flag thrower tells the ref the call, often at a distance, and then the ref announces it immediately.