I'll be sure to pick up the discussion next week, with refreshed readers, but right now I have to use this as an idea board, because it's not let go of me over the past days.

I'll be sure to pick up the discussion next week, with refreshed readers, but right now I have to use this as an idea board, because it's not let go of me over the past days.

They should offer him the role of Nathan Drake (Uncharted). He'd drop that weight faster than a forklift.

They should offer him the role of Nathan Drake (Uncharted). He'd drop that weight faster than a forklift.

I hate ratings discussions so frigging much. After wading through a mire of meaningless gibberish ("XY reached 1.7, Z managed 2.6, AB only 0.80521 within that demographic."), I found both pessimistic numbers for Castle as low as 8.something (which is still a pretty spoiled low in today's TV landscape), and optimistic…

I hate ratings discussions so frigging much. After wading through a mire of meaningless gibberish ("XY reached 1.7, Z managed 2.6, AB only 0.80521 within that demographic."), I found both pessimistic numbers for Castle as low as 8.something (which is still a pretty spoiled low in today's TV landscape), and optimistic…

No, I don't mean to knock on Donna, either. At least - not scathingly. Doing something wrong out of love is a good reason for doing something wrong. Also, that's why I like the A. V. Club - you can come back to it, even if you disagree, to think and discuss… or read witty one liners.

No, I don't mean to knock on Donna, either. At least - not scathingly. Doing something wrong out of love is a good reason for doing something wrong. Also, that's why I like the A. V. Club - you can come back to it, even if you disagree, to think and discuss… or read witty one liners.

Castle is definitely the show that shouldn't be covered regularly, which Dyess-Nugent makes the best case for, after all, with his apt description of how the Case of the Week makes the brain feel. Cloud of boredom, indeed.

Castle is definitely the show that shouldn't be covered regularly, which Dyess-Nugent makes the best case for, after all, with his apt description of how the Case of the Week makes the brain feel. Cloud of boredom, indeed.

Phoning it in.

Phoning it in.

It's really… funny and cute, to watch your mind be actively blown on the page. Thanks for that.

It's really… funny and cute, to watch your mind be actively blown on the page. Thanks for that.

I'm late to the party, but whatever.

I'm late to the party, but whatever.

I think the "any boyfriend at all" argument worked… until she broke off the date with Stuart. It's simply way too construed, her being with Sheldon. She often makes sexual references, mostly towards Penny, and craves intimacy, mostly from Sheldon. When she could potentially have sex, though (with Zach), at the snap of…

I think the "any boyfriend at all" argument worked… until she broke off the date with Stuart. It's simply way too construed, her being with Sheldon. She often makes sexual references, mostly towards Penny, and craves intimacy, mostly from Sheldon. When she could potentially have sex, though (with Zach), at the snap of…

It isn't that Parks and Recreations isn't politics aware, it's that, aside from the fourth season, it's been really incidental to anything going on in the show. If you aren't interested in politics, will you enjoy the show less? I doubt it. If you are interested in politics, will you enjoy politics more (which is Mr…

It isn't that Parks and Recreations isn't politics aware, it's that, aside from the fourth season, it's been really incidental to anything going on in the show. If you aren't interested in politics, will you enjoy the show less? I doubt it. If you are interested in politics, will you enjoy politics more (which is Mr…