Almost everyone who votes for the President on the basis of matching ideology, a legislative agenda, spending and appropriations, and social welfare misunderstands, at least in part, what the President even does. I'm pretty much a socialist; I want the Sanderses of the world making laws, not being a chief executive.

Yeah, that seems a little weird, especially since condoms vary, though people often don't treat them that way.

Life, too. Eventually you succumb to an overdose.

How do we redeem our bonus points? Is it by the mini-shop that just sells huge driftwood clocks by the front?

I still don't understand the skit.

In all seriousness, black guys with small dicks do especially hate the stereotype.

Indy has a lot of sons.

I'm waiting to hear more about this "gay-acting," I'm pretty sure that will go well.

It may not be: I didn't watch much of Xena.

This is always a bit of a conundrum: when there is a negative pattern, like under-representation of happy gay couples (or at least, gay couples not put through the wringer of separation and death) in media, and a particular work portrays something that fits the pattern, how much condemnation should attach to it?…

How many female characters of any stripe have you seen on TV that don't look traditionally feminine?

I kind of thought that, until it came up in a Savage Love article, and it was clear neither Savage nor anyone in the comments understood what the fuck the letter-writer was talking about.

Covered in blood together. It's about togetherness.

Personally I like the idea of "questioning." I don't think people should leap to a label or identity, especially when young. It leads to broken logic like "I don't really feel male" to "I must actually be female" when that might not be quite the case, and questioning accommodates that without forcing you into identity…

It's possible to differ about what is explicit or open. For example, it's always been explicitly, 100%, openly clear to me that Ishmael and Queequeg are a couple in Moby Dick but people still talk about that like it's "subtext." I mean, besides all the relationship stuff they do, like sleeping together and having…

They aren't, and you almost always mean "magazine." And while "gun people" irritate me, and pedantic gun people worse, I'd probably rather have the distinction pointed out to me about a thousand more times before I hear someone else's opinion about what I put on my hot dog one more time.

It's the same thing, for all intensive purposes. Maybe he should of worded it diffidently; but I remain unphased.

Surprised Paramount hasn't sued the creators of Ex Machina for infringing on the idea of a "bot who fucks."

And that's a premise for which show now?

I mean, the Hoover kids were above Taco Bell, but I'm sure lesser schools liked it.