Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    avclub-61435b0fa064e9880d6d882975c575bf--disqus
    Bix
    avclub-61435b0fa064e9880d6d882975c575bf--disqus

    You're right about the car, I was mixing it up with her "slut" reputation starting right after the party.

    Here's something I've always wondered about the rape:

    Yes, because not all of us are rewatching along with you or remember what exactly goes where. Lynn Echolls' suicide comes out of nowhere in your review.

    I've said it here before and I'll say it again: Casting not one but TWO mononymous actresses as potentials made them even more unlikeable.

    We may have to wait longer than we'd like to, possibly a LOT longer. The…umm…more organized subset of the folks who would theoretically be making the show available are ignoring Damages S4 and did the same with the Channel 101 versions of Friday Night Lights. We have to wait for it to show up via random schlubs.

    HUGE SPOILERS FOR NEWBIES

    Jhey, thanks for the Drew Greenberg quote. I hadn't read that interview before and found it by Googling the quote.

    Julie Delpys Lipstick-I probably should've thrown in "to try to make Benson's decision not to come back look bad" in there as an option, especially because it was one kicking around in my head

    When did Amber Benson say she never heard that story?

    zeppomarxist: They DID pretty much reassign Tara's dialogue to Cassie. The Tara version of the script has been online for years (in fact, I've never seen the revised script online): http://www.buffyworld.com/b…

    Wild guess about the stuff flying around and banging noises: The Bringers doing a spell?

    SPOILERS

    Pervy Obit: Brenda went to rehab for her compulsive sexual behavior during the time jump between S2 and S3.

    By the way…
    I was horrified by the preview of A CINEMAX ORIGINAL SERIES before True Blood started.

    So…
    Is it possible for Edie Falco to be on a TV show without Paul Schulze showing up?

    This review cemented my opinion that Phil is the wrong person to review this show. Repeatedly getting the narrative wrong, not liking anything that people actually like about this show, getting character names wrong (Calpurnia CHURCH, not Calpurnia Jones)…and yet it seems he watched the whole run and is a fan of the

    Yes and yes.

    Suggestion for Ryan…
    Could you please summarize things a little better for those of us who aren't watching in sync with you? At the very least, the "Doppelganger" gut-punch twist should've actually been explained.

    How the hell does this episode get reviewed…
    …without John mentioning the phrase "big black sex cop"?!?!?

    I know, I know, it just seems beyond impossible now.